PrefactorvsAgent platforms

Agent platforms get agents into production. Prefactor keeps them doing their job.

You build with one and evaluate with the other, so they are not alternatives: Prefactor watches production runs on any framework, weighing outcome quality and cost.

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Agent platformssee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

An agent platform builds and runs agents on its own framework; Prefactor evaluates the runs those agents produce in production, whatever framework built them. Ship the agent with a platform, then add Prefactor when you need a quality score, drift detection, and cost per agent.

The short answer

Agent platforms or Prefactor, in one table

Decision factorAgent platformsPrefactor
Where it fitsBuilding and running the agentTelling you how the agent is doing
Lifecycle stageDevelopment and deploymentProduction time
Framework scopeBuilds and runs agents on its own frameworkScores agents from any framework
What it measuresLogs, latency, and cost for its own runtimeA quality score, drift, and cost per agent
How it attachesYou build the agent on itNative SDK, core SDK, or OpenTelemetry ingest, no rebuild
Use them together?Build with an agent platformEvaluate with Prefactor
§02 / HONEST CONTRASTscope: different jobs
Honest contrast

What each one is for

What agent platforms do well
  • Orchestration: chains, tools, memory, and reasoning primitives that shorten the path from idea to a working agent.
  • Deployment: infrastructure to run agents without standing up your own.
  • Framework SDKs: abstractions that keep agent code consistent across a team.
  • Native monitoring: logs, latency, and cost for the agents built on the platform.
  • Ecosystem: connectors and community support for common tools and model providers.

Best for engineering teams building agents and moving quickly from idea to a running system.

What Prefactor adds
  • Scores each run for outcome quality, cost, and whether the agent stayed in its approved scope.
  • A quality score per agent tracked across versions, so a regression shows up as a trend rather than a one-off log line.
  • Drift detection when behaviour shifts after a model update or a prompt edit, before a user hits it.
  • Holds or escalates a risky action for review before it reaches a user, not after.
  • One record across frameworks: agents built on different platforms scored from the same place, with an audit trail per decision.

Best for teams running agents in production who need to know each one is doing its job across whichever platforms built them.

§03 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Side by side, building against evaluating

CapabilityAgent platformsPrefactor
Building and running agents
Orchestration (tools, memory, reasoning)
Deployment infrastructure
Native logs, latency, and costFor its own runtime
Evaluating the outcome
Quality score per run
Quality score tracked per agent and version
Drift detection after a model or prompt change
Cost attributed per agent and versionPer platform, build it yourself
Across your stack
Scores agents built on other frameworks
Works with custom agentsPartial
One queryable record per agent
Audit trail for a decision
§05 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where agent platforms stop: whether the agent did its job

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

An agent platform answers how you build and run an agent; its monitoring reports what a run did inside its own runtime. Neither says whether the agent did its job, at acceptable quality and cost.

01
An independent verdict

The platform that runs an agent is also the one grading its own homework. Prefactor sits outside the runtime and puts a verdict on each run.

02
Every framework, one view

A platform only sees the agents built on it. Prefactor keeps one record across every framework in your stack.

03
Drift as a trend

The quality score is tracked per agent across versions, and a behaviour shift after a change is flagged rather than buried in logs.

04
No rebuild

It reads the traces your agents already emit, through a native SDK or any OpenTelemetry source, so you keep what you built.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§06 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
Does Prefactor replace my agent platform?
No. The platform builds and runs agents; Prefactor catches the runs that fall short once they are live. It reads the traces those agents already emit, so the two sit at different stages of the same lifecycle.
Why not use the platform's built-in monitoring?
Built-in monitoring covers the agents built on that platform and reports the mechanics of a run: logs, latency, and cost. It has no view on whether the outcome was right, and it cannot compare an agent against ones built on a different framework. Prefactor covers both.
Does Prefactor work with agents built on different frameworks?
Yes. It scores agents built on LangChain, CrewAI, or custom code from one place, and keeps a queryable record per agent with an audit trail for each decision.
How does Prefactor attach without a rebuild?
Through a native SDK, the core SDK for TypeScript and Python, or OpenTelemetry ingest. It reads the traces your agents already emit, so there is no rebuild and no gateway in the request path.
Do I still need evaluation if the platform already logs cost and latency?
Yes. Logs describe what a run did; evaluation judges whether it did its job. A wrong answer logs the same cost and latency as a correct one, and a regression after a change will not surface from logs alone.
Reviewed against public sources on March 19, 2026Suggest a correction

Prove the agents you shipped are doing their job

Book a demo and we will evaluate a live agent on a fleet like yours: quality per run, drift after a change, and cost per agent, across whichever frameworks built them.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.