Solutions · Product

Know exactly what your agent did, before the support ticket does

A user says the AI did something weird. Prefactor gives you the real trace in minutes: which tool ran, what triggered it, and whether it's a one-off or a pattern, instead of a log-scrolling exercise that ends in a shrug.

Works across OpenAI, Claude, LangChain, CrewAI, and MCP-connected workflows: the same trace, whatever you built on.

incident-trace live
Refund bot approved 40% off User reported
Reported "It gave me way more than the usual discount"
tool_call: apply_discount(pct=40)
flagged: exceeds max_discount policy (15%)
Root cause found 4 minutes, one prompt edit from last Tuesday
§01 / THE DRIFTproblem: behavior changes, nobody notices until a user does

Small changes, and then one day the agent isn't doing what it used to

Models get updated, prompts get tweaked. Each edit looks fine alone, until a user hits a case nobody tested and the first anyone hears is a support ticket.

Expected discount
≤ 15%
This week, actual
up to 40%
Drift, invisible until it isn't

Behavior changes without a deploy

A prompt edit, a model version bump, an integration change: any one of them can shift what an agent does, and nothing announces it happened.

Hard to investigate

"What actually happened?" has no fast answer

When a user reports a problem, the team often lacks visibility into what the agent accessed, what it decided, and why, so investigating means reconstructing a story from scraps.

Monitoring, not intervention

Dashboards show it happened. They don't stop it

Traditional observability tooling surfaces telemetry after the fact. It can't hold a risky action before it reaches a user, or flag that this week's behavior has quietly moved.

§02 / SHIP WITH CONFIDENCEpath: observe → bound → ship

What changes before your next rollout

1
Observe
Every run, every tool call, in real time
2
Bound
Restrict what a risky action can do
3
Ship
Roll out broadly with a way to catch it
Runtime visibility

Every interaction, queryable

Runtime activity, connected systems, and risky actions are tracked as they happen, so investigating a report means searching a record instead of guessing.

Runtime boundaries

Restrict before you roll out broadly

Action-level restrictions, blocking, and approval routing mean a new feature ships with a ceiling on what can go wrong, not just a hope that it won't.

Drift detection

A regression shows up as a trend

Changes in prompts, permissions, and behavior are tracked against an agent's own baseline, so a shift surfaces before it becomes a pattern of user complaints.

Why not just watch the dashboards?

A monitoring dashboard tells you an agent misbehaved after enough users noticed. Prefactor's runtime boundaries mean a risky action can be blocked or held for approval before it reaches the next user, and the trace that explains why is already there when someone asks. Observability and intervention aren't the same job, and shipping fast needs both.

§03 / ROLLOUT CONFIDENCEpath: canary → watch → expand

Ship to 5% before you ship to everyone

A new AI feature doesn't need every user on day one. Roll out to a slice, watch how it actually behaves, and expand on evidence instead of hope.

1
Canary
A small slice of real traffic
2
Watch
Drift and risky actions tracked live
3
Expand
Roll out wider once it's clean
Safer rollouts

Confidence, not a hope

Watch how a feature behaves as workflows, integrations, and operational scope evolve, before deciding it's ready for everyone.

Fast feedback

Iterate on what actually happened

Runtime trend data across a canary group tells a team whether a change is working, not just whether it shipped.

Operational confidence

Expand on evidence, not a deadline

The decision to go from 5% to 100% is backed by the same trace that would explain an incident, not a calendar date.

Frequently asked questions

How does Prefactor help product teams investigate AI issues?
Every runtime action, tool call, and policy decision is logged as it happens, so investigating a user report means searching a queryable trace instead of reconstructing what happened from scattered logs.
Can Prefactor help us ship AI features more safely?
Yes. Runtime boundaries let a team restrict what a new or risky action can do, blocking or escalating it for approval during rollout rather than after a user is affected.
How does Prefactor catch operational drift?
Prefactor tracks prompts, permissions, integrations, and runtime behavior against an agent's own baseline, so a shift after a model update or prompt edit shows up as a trend before it becomes a support ticket.
Does this work across the frameworks we already use?
Yes. Prefactor is framework-agnostic and supports OpenAI, Claude, LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen, Google ADK, MCP-connected workflows, and custom architectures.

See your own agent's trace, not a demo one

Book a demo and we'll walk through investigating a real incident, on a fleet like yours.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs — and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production — across every framework and provider.