PrefactorvsObservability tools

Observability shows you the trace. Prefactor tells you what to fix.

You trace with one and evaluate with the other, so they are not alternatives: Prefactor reads the traces you already collect and judges each outcome against the agent's job.

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Observability toolssee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

Observability tools record what an agent did: spans, tokens, latency, dashboards. Prefactor reads those same traces and adds a verdict: a quality score per run, drift detection, and cost per agent. Keep your tracing, then add Prefactor when you need to know each outcome was right.

The short answer

Observability tools or Prefactor, in one table

Decision factorObservability toolsPrefactor
Where it fitsRecording what the agent didKnowing whether the outcome was right
Primary questionWhat happened on this runWas the outcome right, and at what cost
Unit of analysisThe trace and its metricsA quality score per run and per agent
Change over timeDashboards and alerts on metricsDrift detection when behaviour shifts after a change
How it attachesSDK or OpenTelemetry instrumentationNative SDK, core SDK, or OpenTelemetry ingest, no rebuild
Use them together?Trace with observabilityEvaluate with Prefactor
§02 / HONEST CONTRASTscope: different jobs
Honest contrast

What each one is for

What observability tools do well
  • Tracing: capture each step of a run, prompts, tool calls, tokens, and latency, so you can replay what happened.
  • Metrics and dashboards: latency, token counts, and error rates charted over time.
  • Anomaly alerts: flag a spike in errors or latency and page the on-call engineer.
  • Debugging: drill into a single trace to find where a run went wrong.
  • Wide instrumentation: SDKs and OpenTelemetry support across common agent frameworks.

Best for engineers debugging agent behaviour and watching operational metrics during development and in production.

What Prefactor adds
  • Scores each run for outcome quality, cost, and whether the agent stayed in its approved scope.
  • A quality score per agent tracked across versions, so a regression shows up as a trend rather than a one-off trace.
  • Drift detection when behaviour shifts after a model update or a prompt edit, before a user hits it.
  • Holds or escalates a risky action for review before it reaches a user, not after.
  • One record across frameworks: LangChain, CrewAI, and custom agents scored from the same place, with an audit trail per decision.

Best for teams running agents in production who need to know each one is doing its job, and show the evidence.

§03 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Side by side, tracing against evaluation

CapabilityObservability toolsPrefactor
Recording the run
Span and trace captureReads your traces
Latency, token, and error metricsFor cost, per agent
Dashboards and anomaly alerts
Evaluating the outcome
Quality score per run
Quality score tracked per agent and version
Drift detection against a baselineMetric anomalies only
Cost attributed per agent and versionPer trace, build it yourself
Acting and recording
Hold or escalate a risky action
One queryable record per agent
Scores agents across frameworks from one placeTraces only
Audit trail for a decisionPartial
§05 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where observability stops: whether the agent did its job

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Observability answers what an agent did on a given run: the spans, the tool calls, the tokens, the latency. None of that says whether the agent is doing its job, at acceptable quality and cost, with evidence you can show.

01
A verdict on the outcome

A trace of a wrong answer and a trace of a correct one look the same: same steps, same latency, same token counts. Prefactor puts a verdict on each run.

02
A trend across versions

The quality score is tracked per agent and version, and a shift in behaviour after a change is flagged before a user hits it.

03
A record you can hand over

Each run and each decision lands in a record you can hand to a customer or an auditor.

04
Your instrumentation stays

Prefactor reads the traces you already emit, through a native SDK or any OpenTelemetry source, so you keep what you built.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§06 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
Does Prefactor replace my observability tool?
No. Observability records what an agent did; Prefactor catches the runs where the outcome went wrong. It reads the traces you already collect, so the two run together rather than one replacing the other.
Is a quality score not just another metric?
It is a different measurement. Latency and token counts describe the mechanics of a run. A quality score judges the outcome: whether the answer was right, stayed in scope, and cost what it should. A run can look healthy on every metric and still be wrong.
How does Prefactor attach to agents I already trace?
Through a native SDK, the core SDK for TypeScript and Python, or OpenTelemetry ingest. It reads existing traces, so there is no rebuild and no gateway in the request path.
Do I still need evaluation if I have tracing and alerts?
Yes. Tracing shows a single run and alerts fire on metric spikes. Neither tells you whether outcomes are correct across versions, or flags a quality regression after a prompt or model change before a user hits it.
Does Prefactor work across different agent frameworks?
Yes. It scores agents built on LangChain, CrewAI, or custom code from one place, and keeps a queryable record per agent with an audit trail for each decision.
Reviewed against public sources on March 19, 2026Suggest a correction

Improve the agents you already trace

Book a demo and we will evaluate a live agent on a fleet like yours: quality per run, drift after a change, and cost per agent.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.