Solutions · Founders

Answer the security questionnaire before it stalls the deal

An enterprise buyer asks for audit logs, PII handling, and access controls before they'll sign. Prefactor gives a small team that answer on day one: no security hire, no governance system built from scratch while you're also trying to ship.

One SDK integration, not one hire: works across LangChain, CrewAI, Claude Agent SDK, and custom frameworks.

security-review live
Enterprise prospect, security review Blocking the deal
Asked: "Do you have audit logs for every AI agent action, and how do you handle PII in outputs?"
Answered: exported immutable audit trail, PII redaction policy, and per-agent access scope, same day
Outcome: security review cleared, deal moves to contract
§01 / THE GAPproblem: enterprise-ready, without an enterprise headcount

Your product is ready. Your evidence isn't

A three-person team can ship an AI feature enterprise buyers want. Proving it's governed, without a dedicated security hire, is the part that usually stalls.

Build it yourself

Registry, audit trail, PII detection, risk scoring: months of engineering time before the first sale it unblocks.

One SDK integration

The same evidence, live from the deploy step that already ships your agent.

No dedicated hire

Governance without a headcount line

Audit trails, PII detection, and access boundaries that would otherwise need a security engineer to build and maintain, running from an SDK your existing team installs.

Deals don't stall

Answer the questionnaire, not defer it

An enterprise security review asks specific questions on a specific timeline. Having the evidence already generated means answering this week, not after a quarter of building.

Costs stay visible

Know what each agent actually spends

Per-agent cost attribution from day one, so a runaway token bill shows up as a number you already had, not a surprise on the next invoice.

§02 / DAY ONEpath: install → observe → evidence

What's ready before your next enterprise call

1
Install
SDK into the framework you already use
2
Observe
Every run, cost, and access attempt tracked
3
Evidence
Exportable audit trail, ready when asked
Agent registry

An answer to "what AI do you run?"

Every agent, its owner, framework, and version in one inventory, the first thing a security review asks for. See the agent registry →.

PII detection

Sensitive data caught, not shipped

Names, emails, and credentials in an agent's output are detected and can be redacted automatically, before a buyer's security team has to ask about it.

Immutable audit trail

The export that closes the review

Every action, timestamped and tamper-evident, exportable as the evidence a security questionnaire asks for. See the audit trail →.

Why not just build it yourself?

A registry, an audit trail, PII detection, and risk scoring are all buildable in-house, and some teams do. The honest question is what else that engineering time isn't spent on while you build it, and whether the enterprise deal in front of you can wait that long. See the build vs. buy breakdown → for what building this yourself actually requires.

§03 / SPEND, VISIBLEpath: track → cap → alert

Know what each agent costs before the invoice tells you

A small team can't absorb a runaway token bill. Every call is tagged with the agent that spent it, so a budget is a number you set, not a hope.

Support Assistant, monthly budget$412 / $500
Approaching cap: throttles automatically at 100%, no manual watch required
Cost tracking

Attributed to the agent that spent it

Token, API, and compute cost roll up from task to agent to team, so a spike traces back to the run that caused it.

Budgets, enforced

A cap that actually holds

Set a daily, weekly, or monthly limit per agent, and Prefactor throttles or blocks further calls at the threshold, not after the invoice arrives.

Anomaly alerts

A loop catches itself

A misconfigured agent burning through its budget in an hour instead of a month routes to the alert channel your small team already watches.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need a dedicated security or compliance hire to use Prefactor?
No. The SDK instruments your existing agent code, and the registry, audit trail, and PII detection it produces are the same evidence a dedicated hire would otherwise have to build and maintain.
How fast can I answer an enterprise security questionnaire with this?
Once the SDK is integrated, the audit trail, agent inventory, and PII handling policy are already being generated, so answering a review is an export, not a new engineering project.
Does this work with the framework we already built on?
Yes. Prefactor is framework-agnostic with native support for LangChain, CrewAI, Claude Agent SDK, and Vercel AI SDK, plus a core SDK for anything else.
What if we outgrow this and want to build our own governance stack later?
Nothing about the integration locks you in architecturally. Most teams that reach the scale to justify a dedicated build already have the audit history and risk data Prefactor generated to carry forward.

See what a security review looks like, answered

Book a demo and we'll walk through the exact evidence an enterprise buyer's security team asks for.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs — and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production — across every framework and provider.