Langfuse alternatives
15 platforms that trace and evaluate AI agents, compared with Langfuse on production evals, runtime controls, licence and hosting. Checked against each vendor's own pages on 20 October 2026.
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it.
What are the best Langfuse alternatives?
The best Langfuse alternative depends on why you are moving. Act on a failing run, not only score it afterwards: Prefactor, Galileo and Maxim AI. Another open-source platform you can self-host: Opik. Tracing, evals and deployment from the LangChain team: LangSmith.
Langfuse status, 20 October 2026: Acquired by ClickHouse; licence and self-hosting unchanged, per Langfuse.
| If you need | Look at |
|---|---|
| Act on a failing run, not only score it afterwards | Prefactor scores every production run and can hold, block or stop a failing action. Galileo (Agent Control) and Maxim AI (Bifrost guardrails, Enterprise) also act during a run.Prefactor platformLangfuse vs GalileoLangfuse vs Maxim AI |
| Another open-source platform you can self-host | Opik, from Comet, is Apache-2.0 and its self-hosted release includes online LLM-as-a-judge rules on production traces.Langfuse vs Opik |
| Tracing, evals and deployment from the LangChain team | LangSmith, which traces LangChain and LangGraph with a single environment variable.Langfuse vs LangSmith |
How do the Langfuse alternatives compare?
Langfuse first for reference, then Prefactor, which publishes this page, then the other 14. "Partly" means limited, for example to model calls, one plan or a preview.
| Platform | Scores production traffic | Acts during a run | Open source | Self-hosting | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langfuseownership changed | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Replacing |
| Prefactor | Yes | Yes | Partly | Partly | Platform |
| LangSmith | Yes | Partly | Partly | Yes | vs Langfuse |
| Arizeownership changed | Yes | Partly | Partly | Yes | vs Langfuse |
| Braintrust | Yes | No | Partly | Partly | vs Langfuse |
| Heliconeownership changed | Partly | Partly | Yes | Yes | vs Langfuse |
| Galileoownership changed | Yes | Yes | Partly | Yes | vs Langfuse |
| HoneyHive | Yes | No | Partly | Yes | vs Langfuse |
| Confident AI | Yes | No | Partly | Partly | vs Langfuse |
| Datadog | Yes | Partly | Partly | No | vs Langfuse |
| Fiddler | Yes | Partly | Partly | Yes | vs Langfuse |
| Logfire | Yes | Partly | Partly | Partly | vs Langfuse |
| Opik | Yes | Partly | Yes | Yes | vs Langfuse |
| Raindrop | Yes | No | Partly | Partly | vs Langfuse |
| Maxim AI | Yes | Yes | Partly | Yes | vs Langfuse |
| W&B Weaveownership changed | Yes | Partly | Partly | Yes | vs Langfuse |
How does Prefactor compare with Langfuse?
Where Prefactor goes further
- Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Langfuse does not.
Where Langfuse goes further
- Langfuse includes prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
- Langfuse can be self-hosted. Prefactor is hosted, with enterprise deployments in the customer's region or environment.
- Langfuse publishes its platform as open source. Prefactor publishes its deterministic agent evals package under Apache-2.0; the platform itself is hosted.