PrefactorvsArizevsGalileo

Arize vs Galileo: how to choose

Both are evaluation and observability platforms that now belong to large observability vendors, Arize to Dynatrace and Galileo to Cisco's Splunk. Arize is the one you can start for free, self-hosted or hosted; Galileo is the one with guardrails that act on tool inputs and outputs during a run. The observability stack you already pay for often settles the rest.[3][6]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Arize / Galileosee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Arize and Galileo?

Arize and Galileo differ most in what you can start with for free and in how far their run-time checks reach. Arize offers Phoenix, free to self-host, and a free hosted AX tier; Galileo, sold as Splunk Agent Observability since 7 August 2026, lists only paid annual pricing. Galileo's Agent Control can block harmful model and tool inputs and outputs during a run, while Arize's guards run in your own code around model calls. Both changed owners in 2026: Cisco completed its Galileo deal in May and Dynatrace completed its Arize deal on 1 October.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorArizeGalileo
OwnershipDynatrace, acquisition completed 1 October 2026; Phoenix and AX continueCisco, acquisition completed May 2026; sold as Splunk Agent Observability since 7 August 2026
ProductsPhoenix (self-hosted) and Arize AX (hosted, or self-hosted on Enterprise)One platform, SaaS in Splunk Observability Cloud or on-premises
LicencePhoenix: Elastic License 2.0 (source-available); AX: commercialProprietary platform; SDKs and Agent Control are Apache-2.0
Run-time guardrailsPartial: AX guards run in your code via Guardrails AIYes: Agent Control checks model and tool inputs and outputs during a run
Low-cost judgesDecision Judge for high-volume structured evalsLuna-2 small models; SaaS edition limited to five preset Luna evaluators
Self-hostingPhoenix free; AX on Kubernetes, including air-gapped, on EnterpriseOn-premises, including air-gapped (commercial)
Free tierAX Free: 25k spans a month, 15-day retention; Phoenix free to self-hostNone listed for Agent Observability
Paid pricingAX Pro: $50 a month, 50k spansFrom $100 a month per 1.2 million spans a year, billed annually
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Arize vs Galileo: capabilities side by side

CapabilityArizeGalileoPrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓✓✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓✓✓
Code-based evaluators✓✓✓
Human review and annotation✓✓✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓Partial—
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actionsPartial✓✓
Gateway or proxy in the request pathPartial——
Licence and deployment
Open sourcePartialPartialPartial
Self-hosting✓✓Partial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

Two acquisitions, two parent platforms

Cisco completed its acquisition of Galileo in May 2026, and since 7 August 2026 the product has been sold as Splunk Agent Observability inside Splunk Observability Cloud. Customers onboarded before that date still use Galileo's own documentation and console; later customers use Splunk's. The old Galileo pricing page now redirects to Splunk.

Read more

Dynatrace completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. Its announcement says both Phoenix and AX will continue and that Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time, so packaging may change. Galileo is further along that path: it already carries the Splunk name.

In practice this pair often comes down to which parent you already use. A team that sends infrastructure telemetry to Splunk gets agent evaluation in the same place with Galileo. A Dynatrace customer can expect Arize to move closer to its existing tooling. If you use neither, compare the products on their own terms and allow for further change in both.

How you can start

Arize gives you two free routes. Phoenix is free to self-host with pip, Docker or Kubernetes and covers tracing, datasets, experiments, LLM and code evaluators and prompt versioning. AX Free is a hosted tier with 25k spans a month and 15-day retention. The catch is that continuous evaluation of production traffic, monitors and alerting are AX features; Phoenix's own documentation points to AX for them. Phoenix's Elastic License 2.0 also forbids offering it to others as a hosted service.

Read more

Galileo has no free tier listed for Agent Observability. Splunk offers a separate free edition of Observability Cloud, but its coverage of this product is not stated. Purchasing is annual, and on-premises deployment, including air-gapped, is a commercial option rather than an open-source release.

Instrumentation carries across. Both accept OpenTelemetry traces, and Arize maintains OpenInference, which Galileo also reads through its Python instrumentors. Both list integrations for the OpenAI Agents SDK, LangGraph, CrewAI, Google ADK, Mastra and the Vercel AI SDK, which reduces the work of trialling one and moving to the other. Galileo adds Strands, Microsoft Agent Framework and A2A multi-agent tracing; AX adds an agent trajectory graph that maps which agents call which.

Checks during the run

This is the clearest product difference. Galileo's Agent Control evaluates model and tool inputs and outputs while an agent runs and can block prompt injection, personal data leaks and harmful content using rules set centrally, without changes to agent code. It replaced the deprecated Protect product in June 2026, and its core was released under Apache-2.0 in March 2026. Blocking content is documented; approval workflows for actions are not.

Read more

Arize AX documents guards built on the Guardrails AI framework. They run inside your own code around model calls and can return a default response, re-ask or raise an exception, and guard failures can be traced and alerted on. The platform itself observes rather than intercepts traffic, and there is no documented policy layer for agent tool actions.

On evaluators, Galileo offers Luna-2 small models as lower-cost judges, but the Splunk-hosted edition supports only five preset Luna evaluators and no custom code evaluators; those remain on-premises only. Arize offers LLM judges, agent-as-a-judge on every plan and code evaluators in both products.

Pricing shape

As of 20 October 2026, Arize AX Free costs nothing for 25k spans a month with unlimited users, and AX Pro is $50 a month for 50k spans, 10 GB of ingestion and 30-day retention. AX Enterprise is custom and is the only way to self-host AX. Splunk lists Agent Observability from $100 a month per 1.2 million spans a year, billed annually, with an allowance of Luna tokens and fine-tuning runs.

Read more

The units differ: Arize prices a monthly span allowance, Splunk an annual one. Model your own traffic against Arize's pricing and Splunk's pricing, and expect both to be revisited as the products fold into their new parents.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run and acts on what it finds through runtime policies on tool calls and data access, approval holds for risky actions, and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Galileo's Agent Control is the nearer of these two to that, since it blocks content during a run; Arize's guards sit in your own code around model calls. Neither documents approval holds. Prefactor has no prompt playground or prompt registry and its platform is hosted, so if free self-hosting is the requirement, Phoenix is the better fit. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Arize if

  • You want to start free, either self-hosted with Phoenix or on the hosted AX Free tier.
  • You run Dynatrace, or expect to, and want agent evaluation next to it.
  • Monthly, self-serve pricing suits how you buy.
  • Guards in your own code around model calls cover the run-time checks you need.

Pick Galileo if

  • You already use Splunk Observability Cloud, or Cisco is a strategic vendor.
  • You need content checks on tool inputs and outputs during a run, set centrally.
  • Luna-2 small models as lower-cost judges appeal for high-volume scoring.
  • Annual, sales-led purchasing and an on-premises option fit your organisation.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Arize pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Arize documentation
  3. Arize ownership and status
  4. Galileo pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. Galileo documentation
  6. Galileo ownership and status
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Arize and Galileo?
Both trace agents and evaluate them offline and in production. Arize has a free self-hosted tool, Phoenix, and a hosted platform, AX, with a free tier. Galileo, now Splunk Agent Observability, is a paid platform that adds Agent Control, which can block harmful model and tool inputs and outputs during a run.
How does Prefactor compare with Arize and Galileo?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Galileo does too and Arize does so in part. Arize includes prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Which suits a team already on Splunk or Dynatrace?
Usually the one owned by your existing vendor. Galileo is sold inside Splunk Observability Cloud since 7 August 2026. Dynatrace says Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time, while Phoenix and AX continue as products.
Can I self-host Arize or Galileo?
Yes, in different ways. Phoenix is free to self-host, and AX can be self-hosted on Kubernetes, including air-gapped, on the Enterprise plan. Splunk Agent Observability can run on-premises, including air-gapped, as a commercial deployment.
Do Arize and Galileo support OpenTelemetry?
Both do. Phoenix is built on OpenTelemetry and Arize maintains the OpenInference conventions. Galileo accepts OTLP traces and supports OpenInference instrumentors in Python only, alongside its own Python and TypeScript SDKs.
Does the Splunk-hosted Galileo include everything the older Galileo did?
Not entirely. Splunk's documentation says the SaaS edition in Splunk Observability Cloud supports five preset Luna evaluators and lacks custom code evaluators and Luna fine-tuning, which remain available on-premises.
Who owns Arize?
As of 20 October 2026: Dynatrace, which completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. Dynatrace says Phoenix and AX will continue and that Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time.
Is Arize open source?
Partly. Phoenix's code is public under the Elastic License 2.0, which is source-available rather than open source: you can self-host and modify it but not offer it to others as a hosted service. AX is commercial.
How much does Arize cost?
As of 20 October 2026: AX Free is $0 for 25k spans a month with 15-day retention. AX Pro is $50 a month for 50k spans with 30-day retention. AX Enterprise is custom and is the only self-hosted AX option. Phoenix is free to self-host.
Can Arize block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Arize AX documents guards built on the Guardrails AI framework that run in your own code around model calls. There is no documented approval or policy layer for agent tool actions.
Who owns Galileo?
As of 20 October 2026: Cisco, which completed its acquisition of Galileo in May 2026. Since 7 August 2026 the product has been sold as Splunk Agent Observability inside Splunk Observability Cloud.
Is Galileo open source?
Partly. The platform is proprietary. Its Python and TypeScript SDKs and Agent Control, its run-time guardrail layer, are open source under Apache-2.0.
How much does Galileo cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Splunk lists Agent Observability from $100 a month per 1.2 million spans a year, billed annually, with a Luna model allowance. No free tier is listed. On-premises deployment is available.
Can Galileo block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Agent Control checks model and tool inputs and outputs during a run and can block prompt injection, personal data leaks and harmful content using rules set in one place, without changes to agent code.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.