PrefactorvsArizevsLangfuse

Arize vs Langfuse: how to choose

Both offer a free tool you can run yourself and a hosted platform, both are built on OpenTelemetry, and both were acquired in 2026. The difference that matters is what the free self-hosted version does: Langfuse's includes online evaluation of production traffic; Arize Phoenix points you to the paid AX platform for that.[3][6]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Arize / Langfusesee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Arize and Langfuse?

Both changed owners this year: ClickHouse acquired Langfuse in January 2026 and Dynatrace completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. Langfuse is MIT-licensed and its free self-hosted version scores production traffic. Arize's free self-hosted tool, Phoenix, is source-available under the Elastic License, and continuous production evals sit in its paid platform, AX.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorArizeLangfuse
OwnershipAcquired by Dynatrace, completed 1 October 2026; Phoenix and AX continueAcquired by ClickHouse, January 2026; no planned licence changes
ProductsPhoenix (self-hosted) and Arize AX (hosted or Enterprise self-hosted)One product, hosted (Langfuse Cloud) or self-hosted
LicencePhoenix: Elastic License 2.0 (source-available); AX: commercialMIT, except add-ons in the ee folders
Online evals in the free self-hosted versionNo; Phoenix docs point to AX for continuous production evalsYes, evaluator rules with sampling
OpenTelemetryBuilt on it; Arize maintains the OpenInference conventionsOTLP over HTTP; gRPC not supported
Runtime guardrailsPartial: AX guards run in your code via Guardrails AINone; evaluation happens after the fact
Free hosted tierAX Free: 25k spans a month, 15-day retentionHobby: 50k units a month, 30 days of data
First paid tierAX Pro: $50 a month, 50k spansCore: $29 a month, 100k units
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Arize vs Langfuse: capabilities side by side

CapabilityArizeLangfusePrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓✓✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓✓✓
Code-based evaluators✓✓✓
Human review and annotation✓✓✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓✓—
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actionsPartial—✓
Gateway or proxy in the request pathPartial——
Licence and deployment
Open sourcePartial✓Partial
Self-hosting✓✓Partial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

Two acquisitions, two different promises

Langfuse joined ClickHouse in January 2026 and said its roadmap would not change, its licence would not change and self-hosting would stay a first-class option. It has kept shipping since: code evaluators in May, a 1.0 command-line tool in August and evaluator backfills in September.

Read more

Dynatrace completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. Its announcement says both Phoenix and AX will continue and that Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time. If you already run Dynatrace, that integration may be the deciding factor. If you do not, watch how packaging and pricing change over the next few quarters before committing a large rollout.

What the free version includes

This is where the two differ most for a team on a budget. Self-hosted Langfuse includes tracing, datasets and experiments, prompt versioning and online evaluator rules that score live production traffic. You run Postgres, ClickHouse, Redis and object storage; there is no subscription.

Read more

Phoenix, Arize's self-hosted tool, includes tracing, datasets, experiments, LLM and code evaluators and prompt versioning. Continuous evaluation of production traffic, monitors, alerting and automated issue detection are Arize AX features, and Phoenix's own documentation points users to AX for them.

Licence matters too. Langfuse is MIT-licensed. Phoenix uses the Elastic License 2.0, which lets you read, modify and self-host the code but forbids offering it to others as a hosted service. For most internal deployments that makes no difference; for a platform team building a service on top of it, check the terms.

Tracing and OpenTelemetry

Both accept OpenTelemetry traces, so instrumentation is portable between them. Arize maintains OpenInference, a set of OpenTelemetry conventions for LLM and agent spans that several other tools also read. Langfuse accepts OTLP over HTTP (not gRPC) and maps OpenInference-style attributes.

Read more

For multi-agent systems, Arize AX draws an agent trajectory graph of which agents call which, set automatically for frameworks such as LangGraph and CrewAI. Langfuse added an agent graph view in July 2026 and groups multi-step runs into sessions.

Which costs less at your volume?

Both can cost nothing if you self-host: Phoenix and Langfuse are free to run on your own infrastructure, and you pay for the servers and the time to operate them. The difference on self-hosting is scope, not price: self-hosted Langfuse includes online evals, while Phoenix leaves continuous production evals to the paid AX platform.

Read more

On the hosted plans, as of 20 October 2026, Langfuse Hobby is free for 50k units a month with 30 days of data, Core is $29 a month for 100k units and then $8 per 100k, and Pro is $199 a month. Arize AX Free covers 25k spans a month with 15-day retention, AX Pro is $50 a month for 50k spans with 30-day retention, and AX Enterprise, the only self-hosted AX option, is priced on request.

A Langfuse unit counts traces, observations and scores, while Arize counts spans, so run a week of your own traffic through each calculator before comparing totals. Check Arize pricing and Langfuse pricing directly; both changed in 2026.

Acting on what the evals find

Langfuse does not block or hold anything at run time; its documentation says protection comes from separate libraries and Langfuse evaluates it afterwards. Arize AX documents guards built on the Guardrails AI framework that run in your own code around model calls and can return a default response or re-ask. Neither documents approval workflows or policy checks on an agent's tool calls.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of every run, in development and in production, and can act on a failing score with runtime policies, approval holds and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Its platform is hosted and it has no prompt playground, so if free self-hosting or prompt iteration is the requirement, Langfuse or Phoenix is the better fit. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Arize if

  • You run Dynatrace, or expect to, and want agent evaluation alongside it.
  • You want OpenInference and OpenTelemetry at the centre of your instrumentation.
  • You will pay for AX once you need continuous production evals and monitoring.
  • An agent trajectory graph across many agents is important to you.

Pick Langfuse if

  • You need production evals in a free, self-hosted deployment.
  • You want an MIT licence with no restriction on how you host it.
  • A low first paid tier on the hosted version matters.
  • Prompt versioning tied to traces is part of your daily workflow.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Arize pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Arize documentation
  3. Arize ownership and status
  4. Langfuse pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. Langfuse documentation
  6. Langfuse ownership and status
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Arize and Langfuse?
Both offer agent tracing and evaluation with a self-hosted option. Langfuse is one MIT-licensed product whose free self-hosted version includes online evals. Arize has two: Phoenix, source-available and self-hosted, and AX, a commercial platform where continuous production evals and monitoring live.
How does Prefactor compare with Arize and Langfuse?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Arize does so in part and Langfuse does not. Arize and Langfuse both include prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Can I move from Phoenix to Langfuse, or the other way?
Usually, because both accept OpenTelemetry traces. Instrumentation built on OpenTelemetry or OpenInference conventions can point at either backend. Datasets, prompts and evaluator configurations are product-specific and need exporting and recreating.
What happened to Arize and Langfuse in 2026?
ClickHouse acquired Langfuse in January 2026, and Dynatrace completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. Both say their products continue; Dynatrace says Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time.
Which has the bigger free tier?
As of 20 October 2026, Langfuse's hosted Hobby tier includes 50k units a month with 30 days of data, and Arize AX Free includes 25k spans a month with 15-day retention. Both can also be self-hosted for free, with different feature sets.
Which is better for multi-agent systems?
Both trace multi-step runs and sessions. Arize AX draws an agent trajectory graph showing which agents call which, set automatically for frameworks such as LangGraph and CrewAI. Langfuse added an agent graph view in July 2026. Test both on one of your own multi-agent runs.
Who owns Arize?
As of 20 October 2026: Dynatrace, which completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. Dynatrace says Phoenix and AX will continue and that Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time.
Is Arize open source?
Partly. Phoenix's code is public under the Elastic License 2.0, which is source-available rather than open source: you can self-host and modify it but not offer it to others as a hosted service. AX is commercial.
How much does Arize cost?
As of 20 October 2026: AX Free is $0 for 25k spans a month with 15-day retention. AX Pro is $50 a month for 50k spans with 30-day retention. AX Enterprise is custom and is the only self-hosted AX option. Phoenix is free to self-host.
Can Arize block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Arize AX documents guards built on the Guardrails AI framework that run in your own code around model calls. There is no documented approval or policy layer for agent tool actions.
Who owns Langfuse?
As of 20 October 2026: ClickHouse, Inc., which acquired Langfuse in January 2026. Langfuse said its roadmap and licence would not change and that self-hosting stays a first-class option.
Is Langfuse open source?
Yes. The repository is MIT-licensed, apart from add-on features in its ee folders that need a licence key. Self-hosting on Docker or Kubernetes is free.
How much does Langfuse cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Hobby is free with 50k units a month and 30 days of data, and self-hosting is free. Core is $29 a month for 100k units, then $8 per 100k. Pro is $199 a month, and Enterprise is $2,499 a month or custom.
Can Langfuse block or hold a live agent action?
No. Langfuse evaluates runs after they happen. Its documentation says run-time protection comes from separate libraries, and Langfuse scores those measures afterwards.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.