PrefactorvsArizevsRaindrop

Arize vs Raindrop: how to choose

Both trace agents and score production traffic, but Arize, now owned by Dynatrace, starts from the eval workflow and Raindrop starts from live traffic. Arize gives you datasets, experiments, judges and prompt versioning, with a free self-hosted tool; Raindrop is a hosted monitor built to find recurring failures in production and compare changes on real users.[3][4]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Arize / Raindropsee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Arize and Raindrop?

Arize is a full evaluation suite with a free self-hosted tool (Phoenix) and a paid platform (AX), while Raindrop is a hosted monitor that classifies live agent traffic and groups recurring failures into issues. Dynatrace completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026; Raindrop is independent and announced a Series A in September 2026. Arize covers offline experiments and prompt versioning; Raindrop has neither as a hosted feature and leans on a local open-source tool for writing evals.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorArizeRaindrop
OwnershipAcquired by Dynatrace, completed 1 October 2026; Phoenix and AX continueIndependent; Series A led by CRV in September 2026, $50M raised in total
ProductsPhoenix (self-hosted) and Arize AX (hosted, or self-hosted on Enterprise)Raindrop Cloud (hosted), plus Workshop, an MIT-licensed local debugger
Offline evalsYes: datasets, experiments, LLM and code evaluators in both productsPartial: no hosted runner; Workshop runs evals locally, Simulations in early access
Production scoringAX tasks run evaluators on live traces; Phoenix points to AX for thisSignals classify every new event; Issue Detection groups recurring failures
JudgesLLM judges, agent-as-a-judge and code evaluators you defineSignals drafted from a plain-language description; no custom judge prompt or model
Prompt toolingVersioning and playground in both productsNone documented
Self-hostingPhoenix free; AX on Enterprise, including air-gappedBeta: Enterprise VPC deployment for select partners
Entry pricingAX Free: 25k spans a month; AX Pro: $50 a monthHobby: 1,000 events a month; Pro: $299 a month plus usage
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Arize vs Raindrop: capabilities side by side

CapabilityArizeRaindropPrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓Partial✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓Partial✓
Code-based evaluators✓Partial✓
Human review and annotation✓Partial✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓——
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actionsPartial—✓
Gateway or proxy in the request pathPartial——
Licence and deployment
Open sourcePartialPartialPartial
Self-hosting✓PartialPartial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

One vendor just changed owners, the other just raised

Dynatrace completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. The completion release says Arize will keep supporting both Phoenix and AX and that Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time. For a Dynatrace customer that integration is a point in Arize's favour. For everyone else it means packaging and pricing may move over the next few quarters.

Read more

Raindrop is independent. It announced a Series A led by CRV on 17 September 2026, bringing total funding to $50M, and in the same month launched Simulations in early access. It is a younger product with a narrower scope, and most of its framework integrations are still labelled beta.

Building evals before release, or watching production after it

This is the decision that separates the two. Arize is built for the full loop: you build datasets, run experiments, write LLM-as-a-judge or code evaluators, version prompts and then score production traffic with the same evaluators. Phoenix covers the development half for free; continuous production evals, monitors and alerting are AX features.

Read more

Raindrop assumes you already have an agent in production. You describe a behaviour in plain language, Raindrop drafts a classifier (a Signal) that runs on every new event and backfills a sampled 90 days, and Issue Detection groups recurring failures. Experiments then compare signal rates between cohorts of live traffic, so you can see whether a change helped real users.

The trade-off is control over judging. Arize lets you choose the judge prompt, the model and the code. Raindrop's classifiers are built by its own models, and you cannot bring your own judge. Raindrop's answer to pre-release testing is Workshop, an open-source local tool where a coding agent turns failures into evals and reruns your agent until assertions pass, plus Simulations for pull requests, which is early access.

On the production side the overlap is closer than it first looks. AX has monitors, alerting and automated issue detection of its own. Raindrop adds Slack alerts and a Triage Agent that investigates issues in the web app, in Slack or over MCP, with message limits per plan. If your team already lives in production dashboards, try both on the same week of traffic and compare which surfaces the failures you care about first.

What you can run yourself

Phoenix is free to self-host with pip, Docker or Kubernetes. Its licence is the Elastic License 2.0: you can read, modify and run it internally, but you cannot offer it to others as a hosted service. AX can be self-hosted on Kubernetes, including air-gapped, under the Enterprise plan.

Read more

Raindrop is hosted. Self-hosting is in beta as an Enterprise VPC deployment rolling out to select partners. Workshop runs on a developer's machine but is a debugger, not a copy of the platform.

Both accept OpenTelemetry. Arize maintains the OpenInference conventions that several other tools read. Raindrop accepts OTLP traces over HTTP with gen_ai attributes; it does not accept gRPC, metrics or logs. Arize AX also documents guards built on Guardrails AI that run in your own code around model calls; Raindrop documents no run-time checks on agent actions.

Pricing shape: spans versus events

As of 20 October 2026, AX Free is $0 for 25k spans a month with 15-day retention and unlimited users, and AX Pro is $50 a month for 50k spans with 30-day retention. Phoenix costs nothing beyond the infrastructure you run. Raindrop's Hobby plan is free for 1,000 events a month, after which ingestion stops for the rest of the month, with one custom signal and 14-day retention. Pro is $299 a month plus $0.003 per event up to 1M events, then $0.002, with ten custom signals and unlimited retention.

Read more

Spans and events are different units, so model your own traffic before comparing. Check Arize's pricing and Raindrop's plans before you decide.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run, in development and production, and acts on a failing score through runtime policies, approval holds and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Arize AX's guards run in your code around model calls and Raindrop alerts after the fact; neither documents approvals or policies on agent tool calls. Prefactor has no prompt playground or prompt registry and its platform is hosted, so if free self-hosting or prompt iteration is the need, Phoenix is the better fit. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Arize if

  • You want datasets, experiments and judges you define, before and after release.
  • You need a free self-hosted tool, or AX inside your own network.
  • Prompt versioning and a playground are part of your workflow.
  • You run Dynatrace, or expect to.

Pick Raindrop if

  • Your agent is already in production and you want to find recurring failures in real traffic.
  • Describing a behaviour in plain language and getting a classifier suits your team.
  • You want to compare a change on cohorts of live users.
  • A hosted, self-serve product from an independent vendor suits how you buy.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Arize pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Arize documentation
  3. Arize ownership and status
  4. Raindrop pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. Raindrop documentation
  6. Raindrop website
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Arize and Raindrop?
Arize is an evaluation and observability suite with datasets, experiments, custom judges, prompt versioning and production evals, split between the free self-hosted Phoenix and the paid AX platform. Raindrop is a hosted production monitor that classifies live events with custom signals, groups recurring failures into issues and compares changes on live traffic.
How does Prefactor compare with Arize and Raindrop?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Arize does so in part and Raindrop does not. Prefactor runs offline evals on datasets and experiments; Arize does too and Raindrop does so in part. Arize includes prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Which is better for testing an agent before release?
Arize, as of 20 October 2026. Both Phoenix and AX run experiments on datasets with LLM and code evaluators. Raindrop has no hosted offline eval runner; its Workshop tool runs evals locally with a coding agent, and its pull-request Simulations product is in early access.
Can I self-host Arize or Raindrop?
Arize, yes: Phoenix is free to self-host, and AX can be self-hosted on the Enterprise plan, including air-gapped. Raindrop's self-hosting is in beta as an Enterprise VPC deployment for select partners.
Do Arize and Raindrop support OpenTelemetry?
Yes. Phoenix is built on OpenTelemetry and Arize maintains the OpenInference conventions. Raindrop accepts OTLP traces over HTTP with gen_ai attributes, but not gRPC, metrics or logs.
What changed at Arize after the Dynatrace acquisition?
Dynatrace completed the acquisition on 1 October 2026. Its release says Phoenix and AX will continue and that Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time, so packaging may change.
Who owns Arize?
As of 20 October 2026: Dynatrace, which completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. Dynatrace says Phoenix and AX will continue and that Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time.
Is Arize open source?
Partly. Phoenix's code is public under the Elastic License 2.0, which is source-available rather than open source: you can self-host and modify it but not offer it to others as a hosted service. AX is commercial.
How much does Arize cost?
As of 20 October 2026: AX Free is $0 for 25k spans a month with 15-day retention. AX Pro is $50 a month for 50k spans with 30-day retention. AX Enterprise is custom and is the only self-hosted AX option. Phoenix is free to self-host.
Can Arize block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Arize AX documents guards built on the Guardrails AI framework that run in your own code around model calls. There is no documented approval or policy layer for agent tool actions.
Who owns Raindrop?
As of 20 October 2026: Raindrop is independent. It announced a Series A led by CRV in September 2026, bringing total funding to $50M.
Is Raindrop open source?
Partly. Its local debugger, Workshop, and several SDKs are MIT-licensed; the Raindrop Cloud platform is proprietary.
How much does Raindrop cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Hobby is free with 1,000 events a month. Pro is $299 a month plus $0.003 per event up to 1M events. Enterprise is custom.
Can Raindrop block or hold a live agent action?
No. Raindrop analyses events after they arrive and alerts on issues. It does not document blocking, guardrails or approvals on live agent actions.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.