PrefactorvsArizevsW&B Weave

Arize vs W&B Weave: how to choose

Both trace multi-step agents, run evaluations on datasets, score production traffic and version prompts, and both now belong to larger infrastructure companies. Arize suits teams that want a free self-hosted start and OpenTelemetry at the centre of their instrumentation; Weave suits teams that already train models in W&B or run on CoreWeave.[3][6]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Arize / W&B Weavesee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Arize and W&B Weave?

The difference between Arize and W&B Weave is where each one sits: Arize is a standalone evaluation vendor with a free self-hosted tool (Phoenix) and a hosted platform (AX), while Weave is the LLM and agent part of Weights & Biases, now sold inside CoreWeave Forge. Dynatrace completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026; CoreWeave bought W&B in May 2025 and moved W&B hosted accounts to Forge in September 2026. Phoenix self-hosts for free, while self-hosting Weave needs a W&B licence and a W&B Platform install.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorArizeW&B Weave
OwnershipAcquired by Dynatrace, completed 1 October 2026; Phoenix and AX continueCoreWeave since May 2025; sold inside CoreWeave Forge since 30 September 2026
ProductsPhoenix (self-hosted) and Arize AX (hosted, or self-hosted on Enterprise)Weave, plus Agent Lens, a separate agent product in public preview
LicencePhoenix: Elastic License 2.0 (source-available); AX: commercialRepository is Apache-2.0; self-hosting needs a Weave-enabled licence from W&B
Self-hostingPhoenix free; AX on Enterprise, including air-gappedKubernetes and ClickHouse, on top of a W&B Platform install
Online evalsAX only; Phoenix docs point to AX for continuous production evalsMonitors score production traces; docs now call these a previous approach and recommend Signals
Runtime guardrailsPartial: AX guards run in your code via Guardrails AIPartial: scorers called from Python code can block or modify inputs and outputs
Free tierAX Free: 25k spans a month, 15-day retentionForge Free: 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month, up to 5 model seats
First paid tierAX Pro: $50 a month, 50k spansForge Pro: from $60 a month, 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Arize vs W&B Weave: capabilities side by side

CapabilityArizeW&B WeavePrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓✓✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓✓✓
Code-based evaluators✓✓✓
Human review and annotation✓✓✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓✓—
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actionsPartialPartial✓
Gateway or proxy in the request pathPartialNot stated—
Licence and deployment
Open sourcePartialPartialPartial
Self-hosting✓✓Partial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

Two acquisitions at different stages

Arize's change of owner is the more recent. Dynatrace completed its acquisition on 1 October 2026 and says both Phoenix and AX will continue, with Arize capabilities integrated into Dynatrace over time. That integration has not happened yet, so the products you evaluate today are the ones Arize built.

Read more

Weave's change is further along. CoreWeave completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025, and on 30 September 2026 it launched CoreWeave Forge, which bundles W&B Models, Weave and new CoreWeave tools. W&B hosted accounts now sign in through Forge, and Weave's pricing, documentation and login have moved to CoreWeave domains. The same launch put Agent Lens, a separate agent observability product that shares Weave's trace backend, into public preview, and CoreWeave now recommends it for agent tracing. Expect Weave's packaging to keep moving while that settles.

What you can run yourself

For a team that wants to start without a contract, this is the clearest difference. Phoenix installs with pip, Docker or a Helm chart and costs nothing. It covers tracing, datasets, experiments, LLM and code evaluators and prompt versioning. Continuous evaluation of production traffic, monitors and alerting are AX features, and Phoenix's documentation points you there. Phoenix uses the Elastic License 2.0, which lets you modify and self-host it but not offer it to others as a hosted service.

Read more

Weave's code is in an Apache-2.0 repository, but a self-hosted deployment needs a Weave-enabled licence from W&B and an existing W&B Platform installation, running on Kubernetes 1.29 or later with ClickHouse and S3-compatible storage. Dedicated single-tenant cloud is the other option. In practice, self-hosting Weave is a commercial conversation, and it makes most sense for teams that already self-host W&B for model training. Arize AX can also run on your own Kubernetes, including air-gapped, but only on the Enterprise plan.

Instrumentation, evaluation and run-time checks

Both accept OpenTelemetry. Arize maintains OpenInference, the span conventions for LLM and agent work that several other tools read, and Phoenix is built on OpenTelemetry. Weave accepts OTLP over HTTP and understands OTel GenAI, OpenInference and OpenLLMetry attributes; since its June 2026 SDK release its OpenTelemetry integrations are on by default. Instrumentation written for one can usually be pointed at the other.

Read more

Weave's own SDK centres on a Python decorator, and its TypeScript SDK does less: no class-based scorers, guardrails or cost tracking. Arize offers Python and TypeScript SDKs plus a Go client for Phoenix. For multi-agent work, AX draws an agent trajectory graph set automatically for frameworks such as LangGraph and CrewAI; Weave groups calls into threads and shows OTel GenAI spans in an Agents view.

Neither platform intercepts traffic on its own. AX documents guards built on Guardrails AI that run in your code around model calls. Weave's guardrails are scorers you call from Python application code that can block or modify inputs and outputs. Neither documents approvals or policies on an agent's tool calls.

Pricing shape

The two count different things. As of 20 October 2026, Arize AX prices by spans: AX Free covers 25k spans a month with 1 GB of ingestion and 15-day retention, and AX Pro is $50 a month for 50k spans, 10 GB of ingestion and 30-day retention, both with unlimited users. Weave is priced through CoreWeave Forge by seats, storage and Weave ingestion: Forge Free includes up to 5 model seats and 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month, and Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with up to 10 model seats and 1.5 GB, for teams under 50 employees. The pricing page lists extra Weave ingestion at $0.10 per MB.

Read more

Span counts favour teams with large spans; byte counts favour teams with many small ones. Forge tiers also cover W&B model tracking, which matters only if you use it. Check Arize's pricing and CoreWeave Forge pricing against your own trace volumes.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run, not only the final answer, and acts on what it finds through runtime policies on tool calls and data access, approval holds for risky actions and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Arize and Weave both offer partial run-time checks, guards or scorers you call from your own code around model inputs and outputs, and neither documents approvals on agent actions. Prefactor has no prompt playground or prompt registry and its platform is hosted, so if free self-hosting or prompt iteration is the requirement, Phoenix or Weave is the better fit. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Arize if

  • You want a free self-hosted tool to start with, and can accept the Elastic License terms.
  • OpenInference and OpenTelemetry are central to how you instrument.
  • You run Dynatrace, or expect to, and want agent evaluation alongside it.
  • Span-based pricing with unlimited users fits your traffic and team.

Pick W&B Weave if

  • You already track model training in Weights & Biases or run on CoreWeave.
  • You want LLM tracing and evaluation in the same platform as fine-tuning and inference.
  • Your agents are written in Python, where Weave's SDK is most complete.
  • You already self-host the W&B Platform and can add a Weave licence.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Arize pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Arize documentation
  3. Arize ownership and status
  4. W&B Weave pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. W&B Weave documentation
  6. W&B Weave ownership and status
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Arize and W&B Weave?
Both trace LLM and agent applications, run evaluations and score production traces. Arize is a standalone vendor with a free self-hosted tool, Phoenix, and a hosted platform, AX. Weave is the LLM and agent toolkit within Weights & Biases, sold inside CoreWeave Forge alongside model training tools.
How does Prefactor compare with Arize and W&B Weave?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Arize and W&B Weave do so in part. Arize and W&B Weave both include prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Can I self-host W&B Weave the way I can self-host Phoenix?
Not in the same way. Phoenix is free to self-host. Self-hosting Weave needs a Weave-enabled licence from W&B and an existing W&B Platform installation on Kubernetes, with ClickHouse and S3-compatible storage.
Do Arize and Weave support OpenTelemetry?
Yes, both. Arize maintains the OpenInference conventions and Phoenix is built on OpenTelemetry. Weave accepts OTLP over HTTP and reads OTel GenAI, OpenInference and OpenLLMetry attributes.
What is CoreWeave Forge, and how does it affect Weave?
CoreWeave launched Forge on 30 September 2026 as an umbrella platform for W&B Models, Weave, Agent Lens and other CoreWeave tools. W&B hosted accounts now sign in through Forge, and Weave is priced through Forge tiers. Self-hosted and dedicated-instance accounts are unchanged.
Which suits a team that trains its own models?
Usually Weave, if that training already runs in Weights & Biases or on CoreWeave, because tracing, evaluation and model work sit in one platform. If your models come from API providers and you have no W&B footprint, that advantage does not apply.
Who owns Arize?
As of 20 October 2026: Dynatrace, which completed its acquisition of Arize on 1 October 2026. Dynatrace says Phoenix and AX will continue and that Arize capabilities will be integrated into Dynatrace over time.
Is Arize open source?
Partly. Phoenix's code is public under the Elastic License 2.0, which is source-available rather than open source: you can self-host and modify it but not offer it to others as a hosted service. AX is commercial.
How much does Arize cost?
As of 20 October 2026: AX Free is $0 for 25k spans a month with 15-day retention. AX Pro is $50 a month for 50k spans with 30-day retention. AX Enterprise is custom and is the only self-hosted AX option. Phoenix is free to self-host.
Can Arize block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Arize AX documents guards built on the Guardrails AI framework that run in your own code around model calls. There is no documented approval or policy layer for agent tool actions.
Who owns W&B Weave?
As of 20 October 2026: CoreWeave, which completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025. Since September 2026 W&B hosted accounts sign in through CoreWeave Forge.
Is W&B Weave open source?
Partly. The Weave repository is Apache-2.0, but self-hosting Weave needs a W&B licence and an existing W&B platform deployment.
How much does W&B Weave cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month. Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB, for teams under 50 people; the pricing page lists extra ingestion at $0.10 per MB. Enterprise is custom.
Can W&B Weave block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Guardrails are scorers called from Python application code that can block or modify inputs and outputs. The TypeScript SDK does not support them, and there are no approvals on agent actions.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.