PrefactorvsDatadogvsW&B Weave

Datadog vs W&B Weave: how to choose

Both trace agents, run experiments on datasets, score production traces with LLM judges and version prompts. Datadog fits teams that already run Datadog for application and infrastructure monitoring; Weave fits teams whose model work already lives in Weights & Biases or on CoreWeave. The platform you already pay for usually decides this one.[1][6]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Datadog / W&B Weavesee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Datadog and W&B Weave?

The difference between Datadog and W&B Weave is which platform they extend: Datadog Agent Observability, formerly LLM Observability, puts agent traces next to Datadog's APM and infrastructure data, while Weave puts them next to Weights & Biases model training. CoreWeave acquired W&B in May 2025 and has sold Weave inside CoreWeave Forge since September 2026. Datadog is SaaS only; Weave can be self-hosted with a W&B licence.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorDatadogW&B Weave
OwnershipDatadog, public company; product renamed Agent Observability in June 2026CoreWeave since May 2025; sold inside CoreWeave Forge since 30 September 2026
Sits next toDatadog APM, logs and infrastructure monitoringW&B model training, registry and CoreWeave inference
Self-hostingNone; Datadog-hosted only, not on US government sitesKubernetes with a Weave licence and a W&B Platform install
Runtime guardrailsNot in Agent Observability; AI Guard is a separate product in limited availabilityPartial: scorers called from Python code can block or modify inputs and outputs
Code evaluators in productionRun in your app and submitted via SDK or APICustom monitors and scorers; class-based scorers Python only
SDKsPython, Node.js, Java; Go experimentalPython and TypeScript; TypeScript lacks guardrails and cost tracking
Free tier40K LLM spans a month, 15-day retentionForge Free: 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month
First paid tierPro: $160 a month billed annually for 100K LLM spansForge Pro: from $60 a month, 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Datadog vs W&B Weave: capabilities side by side

CapabilityDatadogW&B WeavePrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓✓✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓✓✓
Code-based evaluators✓✓✓
Human review and annotation✓✓✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓✓—
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actionsPartialPartial✓
Gateway or proxy in the request path—Not stated—
Licence and deployment
Open sourcePartialPartialPartial
Self-hosting—✓Partial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

The question that decides it: which platform you already run

Datadog Agent Observability, renamed from LLM Observability in June 2026, is one module of the Datadog platform and needs a Datadog account. Its strength is correlation: an agent's trace sits next to the backend services, logs and infrastructure it touched, so an on-call engineer can follow a slow or failing run into the rest of the system.

Read more

Weave is the LLM and agent toolkit from Weights & Biases. CoreWeave completed its acquisition of W&B in May 2025, and since 30 September 2026 Weave has been sold inside CoreWeave Forge alongside W&B Models, a registry and CoreWeave inference. W&B hosted accounts now sign in through Forge, and CoreWeave recommends Agent Lens, a separate product in public preview, for agent tracing. Weave's strength is the link to model work: prompts can be linked to the CoreWeave Registry, and its playground can route to CoreWeave's dedicated inference.

Both also track cost. Datadog calculates per-request cost from token counts and public rates for more than 800 text models, with custom values for self-hosted ones. Weave calculates token costs for supported providers, including cache tokens, but only from its Python SDK.

If you run neither platform, both are heavier choices than a standalone evaluation tool, because each makes most sense alongside the rest of its parent.

Hosting and where your traces live

Datadog documents no self-hosted deployment. Traces go to a Datadog-hosted site, and Agent Observability is not available on Datadog's US government sites. Lapdog, a local trace viewer, runs without an account but is a development tool, not a production option.

Read more

Weave offers multi-tenant SaaS, a dedicated single-tenant cloud and a self-hosted deployment on Kubernetes 1.29 or later with ClickHouse and S3-compatible storage. Self-hosted Weave requires a Weave-enabled licence and an existing W&B Platform installation, so it suits teams that already self-host W&B. For an organisation where traces must stay inside its own network, Weave has a documented path and Datadog does not.

Evaluations and run-time checks

The evaluation features are close. Both run experiments against versioned datasets, offer LLM-as-judge evaluators, score sampled production traffic and route traces to human reviewers through annotation queues. One difference sits in code evaluators: Datadog runs them automatically only in experiments, so in production your application runs them and submits the result. Weave runs custom scorers through its monitors.

Read more

Language support also differs. Datadog has SDKs for Python, Node.js and Java, with Go experimental, and accepts OTLP directly with a three to five minute ingestion delay. Weave has Python and TypeScript SDKs and accepts OTLP over HTTP; its TypeScript SDK lacks guardrails, class-based scorers and cost tracking.

Neither blocks actions as part of its observability product. Weave's guardrails are scorers you call from Python application code that can block or modify inputs and outputs. Datadog keeps blocking of prompts, responses and tool calls in AI Guard, a separate product in limited availability, billed per token scanned. Neither documents approval workflows for agent actions.

Pricing units: LLM spans or gigabytes

As of 20 October 2026, Datadog bills only LLM spans, the calls to a model provider; tool, agent, workflow and retrieval spans are free. Free covers 40K LLM spans a month with 15-day retention, and Pro is $160 a month billed annually for the first 100K LLM spans, then $3.50 per 10K, with longer retention extra. Weave is priced through CoreWeave Forge by seats, storage and ingestion: Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month, and Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB, for teams under 50 employees, with extra ingestion listed at $0.10 per MB.

Read more

An agent that makes many tool calls and few model calls is cheap to trace on Datadog's unit. An agent with large prompts and outputs uses up Weave's byte-based allowance faster. Check Datadog's pricing and CoreWeave Forge pricing with your own traffic.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run and acts on what it finds through runtime policies on tool calls and data access, approval holds for risky actions and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Datadog offers blocking only through AI Guard, a separate product, and Weave's guardrails check content from Python code; neither holds an action for approval. Prefactor is not tied to an APM or training platform, but it has no prompt playground or prompt registry and its platform is hosted, so teams that need those should look at Weave or Datadog. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Datadog if

  • You already run Datadog for APM, logs or infrastructure.
  • You want agent traces correlated with the backend services they call.
  • Your agents make many tool calls, which Datadog does not bill.
  • A hosted-only product is acceptable for your data.

Pick W&B Weave if

  • Your model training already runs in Weights & Biases or on CoreWeave.
  • You need a self-hosted deployment and already self-host the W&B Platform.
  • You want guardrail scorers in your own Python code rather than a separate product.
  • Your trace volume fits within a small monthly ingestion allowance.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Datadog pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Datadog documentation
  3. Datadog website
  4. W&B Weave pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. W&B Weave documentation
  6. W&B Weave ownership and status
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Datadog and W&B Weave?
Both trace agents and evaluate LLM output. Datadog Agent Observability is a module of the Datadog monitoring platform and runs only as SaaS. Weave is the LLM toolkit within Weights & Biases, sold inside CoreWeave Forge, and can be self-hosted with a W&B licence.
How does Prefactor compare with Datadog and W&B Weave?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Datadog and W&B Weave do so in part. Datadog and W&B Weave both include prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Is Datadog Agent Observability the same as Datadog LLM Observability?
Yes. Datadog renamed LLM Observability to Agent Observability in June 2026; its documentation still sits under the llm_observability path.
Can I send OpenTelemetry traces to Datadog or Weave?
Yes, both. Datadog accepts OTLP directly using OTel GenAI conventions or OpenInference, with a three to five minute delay. Weave accepts OTLP over HTTP and reads OTel GenAI, OpenInference and OpenLLMetry attributes.
Which is cheaper for an agent that makes many tool calls?
On listed pricing as of 20 October 2026, Datadog bills only LLM spans, so tool and agent spans add nothing. Weave bills by data ingested, so every span counts toward its allowance. The answer still depends on trace size and model-call volume.
Can I use Datadog and Weave together?
Neither vendor documents a direct integration. Because both accept OpenTelemetry, a team could export the same spans to both, for example Datadog for production correlation and Weave for evaluation next to model training.
Who owns Datadog?
As of 20 October 2026: Datadog, a public company (Nasdaq: DDOG). Agent Observability is one product within the Datadog platform and needs a Datadog account.
Is Datadog open source?
Partly. The platform is proprietary SaaS; instrumentation SDKs such as dd-trace-py are open source. There is no self-hosted option.
How much does Datadog cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Free covers 40K LLM spans a month with 15-day retention. Pro is $160 a month billed annually for 100K LLM spans, then $3.50 per 10K. Only LLM spans are billed; tool and agent spans are not.
Can Datadog block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Agent Observability monitors and evaluates but does not block. Blocking prompts, responses and tool calls needs AI Guard, a separate Datadog product in limited availability, billed per token scanned.
Who owns W&B Weave?
As of 20 October 2026: CoreWeave, which completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025. Since September 2026 W&B hosted accounts sign in through CoreWeave Forge.
Is W&B Weave open source?
Partly. The Weave repository is Apache-2.0, but self-hosting Weave needs a W&B licence and an existing W&B platform deployment.
How much does W&B Weave cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month. Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB, for teams under 50 people; the pricing page lists extra ingestion at $0.10 per MB. Enterprise is custom.
Can W&B Weave block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Guardrails are scorers called from Python application code that can block or modify inputs and outputs. The TypeScript SDK does not support them, and there are no approvals on agent actions.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.