PrefactorvsGalileovsW&B Weave

Galileo vs W&B Weave: how to choose

Both trace agents, run experiments, score production traces and route traces to human reviewers, and both now belong to infrastructure companies. Galileo, now Splunk Agent Observability, has the broader run-time checks, applied to tool inputs and outputs from central rules; Weave has the stronger prompt tooling and a free self-serve start, next to W&B model training.[3][6]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Galileo / W&B Weavesee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Galileo and W&B Weave?

The main difference between Galileo and W&B Weave is how they act during a run: Galileo's Agent Control applies central rules to model and tool inputs and outputs without code changes, while Weave's guardrails are scorers you call from Python code. Both are now sold inside larger platforms: Cisco completed its acquisition of Galileo in May 2026 and has sold it as Splunk Agent Observability since 7 August 2026, and CoreWeave, which bought W&B in May 2025, has sold Weave inside CoreWeave Forge since September 2026. Weave has a free tier; Splunk lists none for this product.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorGalileoW&B Weave
OwnershipCisco (completed May 2026); sold as Splunk Agent Observability since 7 August 2026CoreWeave since May 2025; sold inside CoreWeave Forge since 30 September 2026
Runtime guardrailsYes: Agent Control checks model and tool inputs and outputs during a run, no code changesPartial: scorers called from Python code can block or modify inputs and outputs
EvaluatorsLLM judges, Luna-2 small models, Python code metrics (not in the Splunk-hosted edition)LLM judges, predefined scorers, Python and TypeScript function scorers
Prompt toolingPrompts and playground; version control not documentedVersioned prompts and a playground
Self-hostingOn-premises, including air-gapped (commercial)Kubernetes with a Weave licence and a W&B Platform install
Free tierNone listed for Agent ObservabilityForge Free: 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month
Paid pricingFrom $100 a month per 1.2 million spans a year, billed annuallyForge Pro: from $60 a month, 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Galileo vs W&B Weave: capabilities side by side

CapabilityGalileoW&B WeavePrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓✓✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓✓✓
Code-based evaluators✓✓✓
Human review and annotation✓✓✓
Prompt versioning and playgroundPartial✓—
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actions✓Partial✓
Gateway or proxy in the request path—Not stated—
Licence and deployment
Open sourcePartialPartialPartial
Self-hosting✓✓Partial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

Both now sit inside larger platforms

Cisco completed its acquisition of Galileo in May 2026, and since 7 August 2026 the product has been sold as Splunk Agent Observability inside Splunk Observability Cloud. Customers who joined before that date still use Galileo's documentation; later customers use Splunk's. The old pricing page now redirects to Splunk.

Read more

CoreWeave completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025, and on 30 September 2026 launched CoreWeave Forge, which bundles W&B Models, Weave and new CoreWeave tools. W&B hosted accounts now sign in through Forge, and Weave's pricing, docs and login have moved to CoreWeave domains. CoreWeave also recommends Agent Lens, a separate agent product in public preview, for agent tracing.

The parent platforms point at different buyers. Splunk is an observability and operations platform, so Galileo suits teams that already send infrastructure telemetry there. Forge is a model training and inference platform, so Weave suits teams that train or fine-tune models with W&B. Both products are still settling into their new homes, so expect packaging changes over the next few quarters.

Run-time checks: central rules or code-level scorers

This is the clearest functional difference. Galileo's Agent Control evaluates model and tool inputs and outputs while an agent runs, and can block prompt injection, personal data leaks and harmful content using rules set in one place, without changes to agent code. It replaced the older Protect product in June 2026, and its core was released as open source under Apache-2.0 in March 2026, so it can be self-hosted from its repository.

Read more

Weave's guardrails are scorers you call from Python application code. They can block or modify inputs and outputs before they reach users, but each check is wired into your code, the TypeScript SDK does not support them, and Weave documents no checks on tool actions. Neither product documents approval workflows for agent actions.

Evaluators and prompt work

Galileo offers preset and custom LLM judges, Luna-2 small models as lower-cost judges and Python code metrics. One limit to check: the Splunk-hosted edition supports five preset Luna evaluators and no custom code evaluators; those are available on-premises only. Galileo's prompts can be stored, templated and run in a playground, but its prompt documentation does not describe version control.

Read more

Weave scorers can be Python or TypeScript functions, or classes in Python, and it adds local small-model scorers for toxicity and context relevance. Prompts are versioned objects, and the playground compares models side by side and tests prompts against stored traces. Both products have annotation queues for human review. If prompt iteration is a daily job, Weave covers more of it.

Both have Python and TypeScript SDKs. Galileo added multi-turn experiments in June 2026 and offers Autotune, which adjusts judge metrics from reviewer feedback. Weave's Evaluation API compares runs to catch regressions and shares results as leaderboards, and its EvaluationLogger lets you log evaluations from existing code without restructuring it.

Pricing and how you buy

As of 20 October 2026, Splunk lists Agent Observability from $100 a month per 1.2 million spans a year, billed annually, including 500 million Luna tokens and five Luna fine-tuning runs a year; no free tier is listed for this product. CoreWeave prices Weave through Forge: Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month and up to 5 model seats, and Forge Pro starts at $60 a month, billed monthly, with 1.5 GB for teams under 50 employees and extra ingestion listed at $0.10 per MB.

Read more

Weave can be tried today without a sales call; Galileo is an annual purchase through Splunk. For deployment, Splunk offers Agent Observability on-premises, including air-gapped, while self-hosted Weave needs a Weave-enabled licence and an existing W&B Platform install. Check Splunk's pricing and CoreWeave Forge pricing before committing.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run and acts on what it finds through runtime policies on tool calls and data access, approval holds for risky actions and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Of these two, Galileo's Agent Control is the closer match on blocking; Weave's guardrails check content from Python code. Neither documents holding an action for a person to approve. Prefactor is self-serve and not tied to Splunk or CoreWeave, but it has no prompt playground or prompt registry and its platform is hosted. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Galileo if

  • You already use Splunk Observability Cloud, or Cisco is a strategic vendor.
  • You need checks on tool inputs and outputs during a run, set centrally without code changes.
  • You need an on-premises or air-gapped deployment.
  • Annual, sales-led purchasing suits how you buy.

Pick W&B Weave if

  • Your team trains or fine-tunes models in Weights & Biases or on CoreWeave.
  • Prompt versioning and a playground are part of daily work.
  • You want to start on a free tier and pay monthly.
  • Content checks called from your own Python code are enough at run time.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Galileo pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Galileo documentation
  3. Galileo ownership and status
  4. W&B Weave pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. W&B Weave documentation
  6. W&B Weave ownership and status
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Galileo and W&B Weave?
Both trace agents and run offline and online evaluations. Galileo, now Splunk Agent Observability, adds Agent Control, which applies central rules to model and tool inputs and outputs during a run. Weave sits inside CoreWeave Forge next to W&B model training and has versioned prompts and a playground.
How does Prefactor compare with Galileo and W&B Weave?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Galileo does too and W&B Weave does so in part. W&B Weave includes prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Is Galileo the same as Splunk Agent Observability?
Yes. Cisco completed its acquisition of Galileo in May 2026, and since 7 August 2026 the product has been sold as Splunk Agent Observability within Splunk Observability Cloud.
Can I use Galileo's Agent Control with Weave?
Agent Control's core is open source under Apache-2.0 and can be self-hosted from its repository, but neither vendor documents an integration with Weave. Any combination would be your own wiring.
Which supports OpenTelemetry?
Both. Galileo accepts OTLP traces and supports OpenInference instrumentors in Python. Weave accepts OTLP over HTTP and reads OTel GenAI, OpenInference and OpenLLMetry attributes.
Can I try either without talking to sales?
Weave, yes: CoreWeave Forge has a free tier and a monthly Pro plan. As of 20 October 2026, Splunk lists no free tier for Agent Observability and bills it annually.
Who owns Galileo?
As of 20 October 2026: Cisco, which completed its acquisition of Galileo in May 2026. Since 7 August 2026 the product has been sold as Splunk Agent Observability inside Splunk Observability Cloud.
Is Galileo open source?
Partly. The platform is proprietary. Its Python and TypeScript SDKs and Agent Control, its run-time guardrail layer, are open source under Apache-2.0.
How much does Galileo cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Splunk lists Agent Observability from $100 a month per 1.2 million spans a year, billed annually, with a Luna model allowance. No free tier is listed. On-premises deployment is available.
Can Galileo block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Agent Control checks model and tool inputs and outputs during a run and can block prompt injection, personal data leaks and harmful content using rules set in one place, without changes to agent code.
Who owns W&B Weave?
As of 20 October 2026: CoreWeave, which completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025. Since September 2026 W&B hosted accounts sign in through CoreWeave Forge.
Is W&B Weave open source?
Partly. The Weave repository is Apache-2.0, but self-hosting Weave needs a W&B licence and an existing W&B platform deployment.
How much does W&B Weave cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month. Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB, for teams under 50 people; the pricing page lists extra ingestion at $0.10 per MB. Enterprise is custom.
Can W&B Weave block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Guardrails are scorers called from Python application code that can block or modify inputs and outputs. The TypeScript SDK does not support them, and there are no approvals on agent actions.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.