PrefactorvsHeliconevsOpik

Helicone vs Opik: how to choose

Both are Apache-2.0 and can be self-hosted. Helicone is a request logger and AI gateway in maintenance mode, closed to new cloud customers; Opik is an actively developed platform for agent tracing, evals and prompt work. For anything new, that status difference settles it.[3][4]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Helicone / Opiksee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Helicone and Opik?

The main difference between Helicone and Opik is status: Helicone has been in maintenance mode since Mintlify acquired it in March 2026, with new cloud sign-ups disabled, and on 19 October 2026 it said it is no longer part of Mintlify, with no new owner named. Opik, from Comet, is an actively developed Apache-2.0 tracing and evaluation platform. For a new deployment Opik is usually the practical choice; existing Helicone users should plan a migration.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorHeliconeOpik
StatusMaintenance mode since March 2026; cloud sign-ups disabledActive; Opik 2.0 shipped June 2026, with changelog releases through October
OwnershipUnclear: said on 19 October 2026 it is no longer part of Mintlify; no new owner namedComet ML, independent; reports $70M in total funding
Core jobRequest logging and an AI gateway for 100+ providersTracing, evaluation and prompt versioning
EvaluationNot an evaluation framework, per its docs; Python evaluators turned off October 2026Offline experiments and online rules with 30+ built-in metrics
Agent tracingPartial: sessions grouped by request headersEach step traced, including tool calls, with thread grouping
GatewayYes, with failover, caching and rate limitsBeta, for development and testing only
Self-hostingYes, Apache-2.0; gateway deployed alongsideYes, Apache-2.0; Kubernetes for production
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Helicone vs Opik: capabilities side by side

CapabilityHeliconeOpikPrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)Partial✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry supportPartial✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)Partial✓✓
Online evals on production trafficPartial✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoringPartial✓✓
Code-based evaluators—✓✓
Human review and annotationPartial✓✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓✓—
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actionsPartialPartial✓
Gateway or proxy in the request path✓Partial—
Licence and deployment
Open source✓✓Partial
Self-hosting✓✓Partial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

Helicone's status as of 20 October 2026

Mintlify announced its acquisition of Helicone on 3 March 2026 and said the product would move to a maintenance-only phase covering patches, bug fixes and new model support, and that it would help customers migrate to other platforms. Cloud sign-ups have shown 'Sign ups are disabled' since the same day, and the public changelog has no feature entries after November 2025.

Read more

On 19 October 2026 Helicone replaced its acquisition messaging with a banner saying it is no longer part of Mintlify, with details to come. No new owner or structure has been named. The same week, Python evaluators were turned off and judge calls were rate limited. Earlier, in May 2026, an AWS account lock took the dashboard and log processing down for about four days while the proxy stayed up. For a new deployment, no cloud account can be opened on any plan, and self-hosting means depending on a codebase whose future owner is not yet known.

A gateway and logger versus an evaluation platform

Helicone's core is its AI Gateway: one OpenAI-compatible endpoint for more than 100 providers, with automatic failover, caching, custom rate limits and bring-your-own keys. It logs every request, tracks cost across more than 300 models with cost alerts, and versions prompts with environments and deployment by prompt ID. Agent runs are grouped into sessions through request headers, a path-based hierarchy rather than a span model. Its gateway can block prompt injection and jailbreak attempts, for OpenAI models only. Its documentation says plainly that Helicone is not an evaluation framework.

Read more

Opik is built for evaluation. It traces each agent step, including retrieval and tool calls, groups conversations into threads, and scores sampled production traffic with online rules using more than 30 built-in metrics, custom judges or custom Python metrics. It adds annotation queues, a Prompt Library with environment-tagged versions, a Prompt Optimizer and guardrails your code calls. Its own LLM Gateway is in beta and documented for development and testing only.

Moving from Helicone to Opik

The products overlap least on the gateway, so start there. If Helicone sits in your request path for routing, failover or caching, do not plan to replace it with Opik's beta gateway. Opik integrates with third-party gateways, including LiteLLM, Portkey, OpenRouter, Kong AI Gateway, TrueFoundry and Vercel AI Gateway, and lists Helicone itself among them, so you can keep traffic flowing through Helicone while tracing moves to Opik, then replace the gateway as a separate step.

Read more

Instrumentation moves from Helicone's headers or async SDKs to Opik's SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Java or .NET, or to OTLP over HTTP. Neither vendor documents an import path for prompts, so prompts versioned in Helicone need recreating in Opik's Prompt Library. Scores you computed outside Helicone and posted to it can become built-in or custom metrics that Opik runs itself.

A workable order is to move tracing first while Helicone keeps routing traffic, then set up Opik's online rules and annotation queues on the new traces, then replace the gateway. Teams that self-host Helicone in the meantime should keep up with its patches: September 2026 fixed a platform-admin takeover and a cross-tenant read in its query language, and October brought further hardening for self-hosted deployments.

Pricing shape

Helicone's pricing page still lists, as of 20 October 2026, a free Hobby plan with 10K requests, 1 GB of storage, 1 seat and 7-day retention, Pro at $79 a month and Team at $799 a month. With sign-ups disabled, new customers cannot start on any of them. Opik's Free Cloud covers 25k spans a month for up to 10 team members with 60-day retention, and Pro Cloud is $19 a month for 100k spans, then $5 per 100k. Both can be self-hosted for free. See Helicone's pricing and Opik's pricing.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run and can act on a failing score through runtime policies, approval holds and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Helicone's gateway blocks prompt injection for OpenAI models only, and Opik's guardrails depend on calls in your code; neither has approval holds or tool-call policies. Prefactor has no prompt playground or prompt registry, no gateway, and its platform is hosted, so it does not replace Helicone's routing. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Stay on Helicone for now if

  • You already run it, self-hosted, and its gateway is in your request path.
  • You need time to choose and test a replacement gateway.
  • Request logging and cost tracking are all you use it for.
  • You accept that it receives patches only and its ownership is unsettled.

Pick Opik if

  • You are starting a new deployment and need a cloud account today.
  • You need evaluation, not only request logging.
  • You want agent steps traced as spans rather than grouped by headers.
  • You want an actively developed Apache-2.0 platform you can self-host.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Helicone pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Helicone documentation
  3. Helicone ownership and status
  4. Opik pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. Opik documentation
  6. Opik website
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Helicone and Opik?
Helicone is a request logger and AI gateway that has been in maintenance mode since March 2026 and is closed to new cloud sign-ups. Opik is an actively developed Apache-2.0 platform from Comet for tracing agents, running offline and online evaluations and versioning prompts.
How does Prefactor compare with Helicone and Opik?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Helicone and Opik do so in part. Prefactor scores live production traffic automatically; Opik does too and Helicone does so in part. Helicone and Opik both include prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Can I still sign up for Helicone Cloud?
No. As of 20 October 2026, Helicone's cloud sign-up page has shown 'Sign ups are disabled' since 3 March 2026, so new customers cannot start on any plan.
Should existing Helicone users migrate now?
Plan for it. Helicone has shipped no features since November 2025, turned off Python evaluators in October 2026, and on 19 October 2026 said it is no longer part of Mintlify without naming a new owner. Mintlify said at the acquisition that it would help customers move to other platforms.
Can Opik work with Helicone's gateway during a migration?
Yes. Opik lists Helicone among the third-party gateways it integrates with, so traffic can keep flowing through Helicone while tracing and evaluation move to Opik.
Can I keep running Helicone self-hosted instead?
You can. The main repository is Apache-2.0 and supports Docker, Docker Compose and Kubernetes. The Docker image no longer proxies traffic, so the AI Gateway must run alongside it, and that separate Rust gateway is GPL-3.0 and has not been updated since November 2025.
Who owns Helicone?
As of 20 October 2026: Unclear. Mintlify acquired Helicone in March 2026 and moved it to maintenance mode. On 19 October 2026 Helicone began saying it is no longer part of Mintlify, with no new owner named.
Is Helicone open source?
Yes. The main repository is Apache-2.0 and can be self-hosted. Its separate Rust AI gateway is GPL-3.0 and has not been updated since November 2025.
How much does Helicone cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Hobby is free with 10K requests, Pro is $79 a month and Team $799 a month, with Enterprise custom. New cloud sign-ups have been disabled since March 2026, so new customers cannot start on any plan.
Can Helicone block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Its gateway can block prompt injection and jailbreak attempts, for OpenAI models only, and apply rate limits. There are no approvals or policies on agent tool actions.
Who owns Opik?
As of 20 October 2026: Comet ML, Inc., an independent company founded in 2017 that reports $70M in total funding.
Is Opik open source?
Yes. The core platform, including tracing, evaluation, the UI, backend and SDKs, is Apache-2.0 and free to self-host.
How much does Opik cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Self-hosting is free with unlimited spans. Free Cloud covers 25k spans a month and 10 users. Pro Cloud is $19 a month for 100k spans, then $5 per 100k. Enterprise is custom.
Can Opik block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Opik guardrails run as a blocking check that your code must call and handle. There are no approval workflows for agent actions.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.