PrefactorvsLangfusevsW&B Weave

Langfuse vs W&B Weave: how to choose

Both trace agents, run experiments, score production traffic, queue traces for human review and version prompts. Langfuse is the open-source option you can self-host for free; Weave is the choice when your model training already lives in Weights & Biases or on CoreWeave. Both changed owners, and both say their products continue.[3][6]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Langfuse / W&B Weavesee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Langfuse and W&B Weave?

The difference between Langfuse and W&B Weave is mostly how you can run them: Langfuse is MIT-licensed and free to self-host, while self-hosting Weave needs a W&B licence and an existing W&B Platform install. Both changed owners: ClickHouse acquired Langfuse in January 2026, and CoreWeave, which bought W&B in May 2025, has sold Weave inside CoreWeave Forge since September 2026. Weave can block content during a run through scorers in Python code; Langfuse evaluates after the fact.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorLangfuseW&B Weave
OwnershipAcquired by ClickHouse in January 2026; licence and self-hosting unchanged, per LangfuseCoreWeave since May 2025; sold inside CoreWeave Forge since 30 September 2026
LicenceMIT, except add-ons in the ee foldersRepository Apache-2.0; self-hosting needs a Weave-enabled licence
Self-hostingFree, via Docker or KubernetesKubernetes, on top of a licensed W&B Platform install
TypeScriptPython and TypeScript SDKsTypeScript SDK lacks guardrails, class-based scorers and cost tracking
Runtime guardrailsNone; evaluation happens after the factPartial: scorers called from Python code can block or modify inputs and outputs
Online evalsEvaluator rules with sampling, plus backfills over past dataMonitors on production traces; docs now recommend Signals
Free hosted tierHobby: 50k units a month, 30 days of dataForge Free: 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month
First paid tierCore: $29 a month, 100k unitsForge Pro: from $60 a month, 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Langfuse vs W&B Weave: capabilities side by side

CapabilityLangfuseW&B WeavePrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓✓✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓✓✓
Code-based evaluators✓✓✓
Human review and annotation✓✓✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓✓—
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actions—Partial✓
Gateway or proxy in the request path—Not stated—
Licence and deployment
Open source✓PartialPartial
Self-hosting✓✓Partial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

Two owners, one standalone product

Langfuse joined ClickHouse in January 2026 and said its roadmap and licence would not change and that self-hosting would stay a first-class option. It has kept shipping as its own product: experiments rebuilt in April, code evaluators in May, a 1.0 command-line tool in August and evaluator backfills in September. Langfuse Cloud becomes v4-only on 16 November 2026, which may mean migration work for existing cloud users.

Read more

Weave's owner change came earlier and goes further. CoreWeave completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025, and on 30 September 2026 launched CoreWeave Forge, which bundles W&B Models, Weave, Agent Lens and CoreWeave inference. W&B hosted accounts now sign in through Forge, and Weave's pricing, docs and login moved to CoreWeave domains. CoreWeave now recommends Agent Lens, a separate product in public preview, for agent tracing. Weave is less a standalone product than one part of a model platform, which is its main strength for W&B users and its main cost for everyone else.

Self-hosting: free, or licensed on top of W&B

Both self-hosted stacks use ClickHouse and object storage, so the operating work is similar. The difference is the licence. Langfuse publishes its platform under MIT and documents free self-hosting on Docker Compose or Kubernetes, backed by Postgres, ClickHouse, Redis and S3-compatible storage; a few add-on features in its ee folders need a licence key.

Read more

Weave's code is in an Apache-2.0 repository, but a self-hosted deployment needs a Weave-enabled licence from W&B and an existing W&B Platform installation, on Kubernetes 1.29 or later with ClickHouse and S3-compatible storage. If you already self-host W&B for training, adding Weave may be straightforward. If you do not, Langfuse is the option that works without a sales conversation.

Language support and run-time checks

Langfuse offers Python and TypeScript SDKs, with code evaluators in either language since May 2026, and accepts OTLP over HTTP from any language. Weave's SDK centres on a Python decorator; its TypeScript SDK does not support guardrails, class-based scorers or cost tracking. Both accept OTLP over HTTP only, and both read OpenInference-style attributes. A TypeScript-heavy team will find Langfuse more complete.

Read more

Evaluation features are close. Langfuse's evaluator rules score live production observations with sampling, and since September 2026 can backfill scores over up to six months of past data; a GitHub Action fails a CI run below a score threshold. Weave scores production traces with monitors and alerts through Slack or webhooks, though its docs now call built-in monitors a previous approach and recommend Signals. Both have annotation queues, versioned prompts and a playground.

The run-time picture reverses for Python teams. Weave's guardrails are scorers called from Python application code that can block or modify inputs and outputs before they reach users. Langfuse does not block anything at run time; its documentation says protection comes from separate libraries and Langfuse evaluates those afterwards, with threshold alerts that notify rather than stop. Neither documents approvals on an agent's tool calls.

Pricing shape

As of 20 October 2026, Langfuse prices per unit ingested, counting traces, observations and scores: Hobby is free for 50k units a month with 30 days of data, Core is $29 a month for 100k units, then $8 per 100k, and Pro is $199 a month. CoreWeave prices Weave through Forge by seats, storage and ingestion: Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month and up to 5 model seats, and Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB for teams under 50 employees, with extra ingestion listed at $0.10 per MB.

Read more

Langfuse counts events and Weave counts bytes, so trace size decides which is cheaper. Self-hosted Langfuse has no subscription at all. At the top end, Langfuse Enterprise is $2,499 a month or custom, and Weave Enterprise is a custom quote. Check Langfuse's pricing and CoreWeave Forge pricing against your own volumes.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run and acts on what it finds through runtime policies on tool calls and data access, approval holds for risky actions and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Langfuse evaluates after the fact, and Weave's guardrails check content from Python code without approvals on agent actions. Prefactor has no prompt playground or prompt registry and its platform is hosted, so if free self-hosting or prompt iteration is what you need, Langfuse or Weave is the better pick. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Langfuse if

  • You need to self-host for free, or want an MIT-licensed codebase.
  • Your team writes agents in TypeScript as well as Python.
  • You want a standalone product rather than part of a model platform.
  • A low first paid tier on the hosted version matters.

Pick W&B Weave if

  • Your team trains or fine-tunes models in Weights & Biases or on CoreWeave.
  • You want guardrail scorers you can call from Python code during a run.
  • You already self-host the W&B Platform and can add a Weave licence.
  • Leaderboards comparing models and prompts fit how you review results.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Langfuse pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Langfuse documentation
  3. Langfuse ownership and status
  4. W&B Weave pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. W&B Weave documentation
  6. W&B Weave ownership and status
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Langfuse and W&B Weave?
Both trace LLM and agent applications, run experiments, score production traffic and version prompts. Langfuse is MIT-licensed and free to self-host. Weave is part of Weights & Biases, sold inside CoreWeave Forge, and self-hosting it needs a W&B licence.
How does Prefactor compare with Langfuse and W&B Weave?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; W&B Weave does so in part and Langfuse does not. Langfuse and W&B Weave both include prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Which is better for a TypeScript team?
Langfuse, on the documented features. It has a TypeScript SDK and TypeScript code evaluators. Weave's TypeScript SDK lacks guardrails, class-based scorers and cost tracking.
What changed after ClickHouse acquired Langfuse and CoreWeave acquired W&B?
Langfuse says its roadmap, licence and self-hosting are unchanged, and it has kept shipping. For Weave, W&B hosted accounts moved to CoreWeave Forge in September 2026, and pricing, docs and login moved to CoreWeave domains.
Can I send the same OpenTelemetry traces to both?
Yes, in principle. Both accept OTLP over HTTP, not gRPC. Langfuse maps OpenInference-style attributes, and Weave reads OTel GenAI, OpenInference and OpenLLMetry conventions.
Do I need to act before 16 November 2026?
If you use Langfuse Cloud, check your setup: Langfuse Cloud becomes v4-only on that date, which may require migration work. Self-hosted Langfuse and Weave are not affected by that change.
Who owns Langfuse?
As of 20 October 2026: ClickHouse, Inc., which acquired Langfuse in January 2026. Langfuse said its roadmap and licence would not change and that self-hosting stays a first-class option.
Is Langfuse open source?
Yes. The repository is MIT-licensed, apart from add-on features in its ee folders that need a licence key. Self-hosting on Docker or Kubernetes is free.
How much does Langfuse cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Hobby is free with 50k units a month and 30 days of data, and self-hosting is free. Core is $29 a month for 100k units, then $8 per 100k. Pro is $199 a month, and Enterprise is $2,499 a month or custom.
Can Langfuse block or hold a live agent action?
No. Langfuse evaluates runs after they happen. Its documentation says run-time protection comes from separate libraries, and Langfuse scores those measures afterwards.
Who owns W&B Weave?
As of 20 October 2026: CoreWeave, which completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025. Since September 2026 W&B hosted accounts sign in through CoreWeave Forge.
Is W&B Weave open source?
Partly. The Weave repository is Apache-2.0, but self-hosting Weave needs a W&B licence and an existing W&B platform deployment.
How much does W&B Weave cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month. Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB, for teams under 50 people; the pricing page lists extra ingestion at $0.10 per MB. Enterprise is custom.
Can W&B Weave block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Guardrails are scorers called from Python application code that can block or modify inputs and outputs. The TypeScript SDK does not support them, and there are no approvals on agent actions.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.