PrefactorvsOpikvsRaindrop

Opik vs Raindrop: how to choose

These two start from different ends. Opik is a general evaluation platform with datasets, experiments, configurable judges and prompt versioning, free to self-host; Raindrop watches live traffic, finds recurring failures and compares changes on real users. Whether your agent is in production yet often decides it.[1][4]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Opik / Raindropsee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Opik and Raindrop?

Opik is an open-source (Apache-2.0) platform for tracing and evaluating agents, before release and in production; Raindrop is a hosted platform for monitoring agents already in production, which classifies events with custom signals and groups recurring failures into issues. Opik gives you judges, datasets, prompt versioning and free self-hosting. Raindrop has no prompt versioning or hosted offline eval runner, and builds its classifiers with its own models.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorOpikRaindrop
OwnershipComet ML, independent; reports $70M in total fundingIndependent; Series A led by CRV in September 2026, $50M in total
Centre of gravityEvaluation: datasets, experiments, judges, online rulesProduction monitoring: signals, issue detection, live-traffic experiments
Judges30+ built-in metrics, custom judge prompts, Python metricsSignals drafted from a plain-language description by Raindrop's own models
Offline evalsHosted datasets, experiments and Test SuitesLocal Workshop tool; Simulations on pull requests in early access
Prompt versioningPrompt Library with environment-tagged versionsNone documented
Self-hostingFree, Apache-2.0; Kubernetes for productionEnterprise VPC deployment in beta, select partners
Free tierFree Cloud: 25k spans a month, 60-day retentionHobby: 1,000 events a month, 14-day retention
First paid tierPro Cloud: $19 a month, 100k spansPro: $299 a month plus $0.003 per event
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Opik vs Raindrop: capabilities side by side

CapabilityOpikRaindropPrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓Partial✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓Partial✓
Code-based evaluators✓Partial✓
Human review and annotation✓Partial✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓——
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actionsPartial—✓
Gateway or proxy in the request pathPartial——
Licence and deployment
Open source✓PartialPartial
Self-hosting✓PartialPartial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

Before release, or after it

Opik covers the full loop. You build datasets, run experiments and Test Suites with plain-text assertions, compare prompt versions in a Prompt Library, and then apply online rules that score sampled production traffic. It suits a team that wants the same judges in development and in production.

Read more

Raindrop is built for agents that already have users. Signals are classifiers that run on every new event and can backfill 90 days of sampled history; Issue Detection groups recurring failures; Experiments compare signal rates between cohorts of live traffic, such as two prompt versions. A Triage Agent investigates issues in the web app, in Slack or over MCP.

Raindrop's pre-release tooling is lighter. Workshop is an MIT-licensed local debugger where a coding agent turns failures into code-level evals and reruns the agent until assertions pass. Simulations, which replay production traffic against a proposed change on each pull request, are in early access.

Both track cost. Raindrop's Costs page shows model spend by model, provider and project, and its Experiments report median cost per event. Opik tracks token usage and model cost on traces, and its Cost Intelligence extends this to coding agents such as Claude Code and Codex.

Who defines the judge

In Opik you choose and tune the judge: built-in metrics such as hallucination, answer relevance and task completion, custom judge prompts, an 'Agent as a Judge' that reads traces with tools, or Python metrics that subclass BaseMetric. Since July 2026 you can cap spend per evaluation.

Read more

In Raindrop you describe the behaviour in plain language, label sample events as Match or Not Match, and Raindrop drafts a classifier. Its rd-signal-2 system, released in August 2026, combines generated filter code, a task-specific classification head and an in-house reasoning model for unclear cases. You cannot bring your own judge prompt or model. That trade suits teams who want classification without writing judges; it does not suit teams who must control exactly how a score is produced.

There is some overlap on the debugging side. Opik's Ollie assistant analyses traces and writes fixes with test cases, which covers ground similar to Raindrop's Triage Agent and Workshop, from a different starting point.

Hosting and run-time checks

Opik's core platform is Apache-2.0 and free to self-host, with every feature except user administration. Raindrop Cloud is proprietary; self-hosting is in beta as an Enterprise VPC deployment for select partners. Both accept OTLP traces over HTTP and neither accepts gRPC.

Read more

Opik offers guardrails your code calls as a blocking check, with English-only PII and topic checks. Raindrop documents no blocking or guardrails: it analyses events after they arrive and alerts, and its PII Guard add-on redacts data at ingestion rather than controlling agent actions.

Framework coverage overlaps, but maturity differs. Opik lists more than 30 integrations, with SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Java and .NET. Raindrop's SDKs cover TypeScript, Python and Go, with Rust and Java in beta, and most of its framework integrations are labelled beta.

Pricing shape: spans versus events

As of 20 October 2026, Opik self-hosting is free with unlimited spans. Free Cloud covers 25k spans a month, and Pro Cloud is $19 a month for 100k spans, then $5 per 100k, with 60-day default retention.

Read more

Raindrop's Hobby plan is free for 1,000 events a month, after which ingestion stops until the next month, with one custom signal and 14-day retention. Pro is $299 a month plus $0.003 per event up to 1M events and $0.002 after that, with 10 custom signals and unlimited retention. PII Guard is a separate add-on from $80 a month. The entry prices differ by an order of magnitude, and so does what each plan includes. See Opik's pricing and Raindrop's plans.

Raindrop's Pro plan also includes 500 Triage Agent messages a month.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run and acts on what it finds through runtime policies on tool calls and data access, approval holds for risky actions, and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Raindrop detects failures after the fact and Opik's guardrails run only where your code calls them; neither holds an agent action for approval. Prefactor has no prompt playground or prompt registry and its platform is hosted, so for prompt iteration or free self-hosting Opik is the better pick, and for failure discovery across large volumes of user traffic Raindrop is built for that job. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Opik if

  • You want to evaluate before release as well as in production.
  • You need to control the judge prompt, model or code behind every score.
  • You want prompt versioning in the same tool.
  • You need to self-host, or want a low entry price on the cloud.

Pick Raindrop if

  • Your agent is in production with real users and you need to find recurring failures.
  • You would rather describe a behaviour in plain language than write a judge.
  • You want to compare changes on live traffic cohorts.
  • Unlimited retention on the paid plan matters to you.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Opik pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Opik documentation
  3. Opik website
  4. Raindrop pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. Raindrop documentation
  6. Raindrop website
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Opik and Raindrop?
Opik is an open-source evaluation platform with datasets, experiments, configurable judges, online rules and prompt versioning. Raindrop is a hosted production monitoring platform that classifies live events with signals it builds for you, groups recurring failures into issues and compares changes on live traffic.
How does Prefactor compare with Opik and Raindrop?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Opik does so in part and Raindrop does not. Prefactor runs offline evals on datasets and experiments; Opik does too and Raindrop does so in part. Opik includes prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
Can I bring my own judge model to Raindrop?
No. Raindrop builds signal classifiers with its own models from a plain-language description and labelled examples. Opik lets you write custom judge prompts and Python metrics.
Does Raindrop run offline evals?
Not as a hosted feature. Raindrop Workshop, a local open-source debugger, lets a coding agent write and run code-level evals, and Simulations on pull requests are in early access.
Can I use Opik and Raindrop together?
Both accept OTLP traces over HTTP, so the same OpenTelemetry instrumentation can feed either. One pattern is Opik for datasets, experiments and prompt versions and Raindrop for failure discovery in production, at the cost of two tools and two bills.
Which frameworks do Opik and Raindrop support?
Both cover major agent frameworks, including LangChain, CrewAI, Google ADK, the OpenAI Agents SDK and the Claude Agent SDK. Most of Raindrop's framework integrations are labelled beta.
Who owns Opik?
As of 20 October 2026: Comet ML, Inc., an independent company founded in 2017 that reports $70M in total funding.
Is Opik open source?
Yes. The core platform, including tracing, evaluation, the UI, backend and SDKs, is Apache-2.0 and free to self-host.
How much does Opik cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Self-hosting is free with unlimited spans. Free Cloud covers 25k spans a month and 10 users. Pro Cloud is $19 a month for 100k spans, then $5 per 100k. Enterprise is custom.
Can Opik block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Opik guardrails run as a blocking check that your code must call and handle. There are no approval workflows for agent actions.
Who owns Raindrop?
As of 20 October 2026: Raindrop is independent. It announced a Series A led by CRV in September 2026, bringing total funding to $50M.
Is Raindrop open source?
Partly. Its local debugger, Workshop, and several SDKs are MIT-licensed; the Raindrop Cloud platform is proprietary.
How much does Raindrop cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Hobby is free with 1,000 events a month. Pro is $299 a month plus $0.003 per event up to 1M events. Enterprise is custom.
Can Raindrop block or hold a live agent action?
No. Raindrop analyses events after they arrive and alerts on issues. It does not document blocking, guardrails or approvals on live agent actions.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.