PrefactorvsOpikvsW&B Weave

Opik vs W&B Weave: how to choose

Both trace agents, score production traces with LLM judges and code, run annotation queues and version prompts. Opik is a standalone open-source platform you can run yourself for free; W&B Weave now sits inside CoreWeave Forge and fits teams that already use Weights & Biases for model work. Where your training stack lives often decides it.[1][6]

support-agent v4 · one run, two layersexample
Illustrative run, showing what each layer tells you
Opik / W&B Weavesee
fetch_customer212ms · 1.2k tok
apply_refund1.4s · 3.1k tok
send_reply340ms · 0.8k tok
trace recorded, no verdict
Prefactoradds
Did its job✓ yes
Quality84 / 100
Cost$0.42 · in budget
Drift vs baselinenone
✓ a run that breaches its schema is held for review
§01 / THE SHORT ANSWERtl;dr: which, and when
TL;DR

What is the difference between Opik and W&B Weave?

Opik and W&B Weave both trace and evaluate LLM agents; the difference is that Opik's platform is Apache-2.0 and free to self-host, while self-hosting Weave needs a W&B licence and an existing W&B Platform install. Weave belongs to CoreWeave, which completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025, and since 30 September 2026 W&B hosted accounts sign in through CoreWeave Forge. Weave suits teams already training models on W&B; Opik suits teams that want a standalone open-source platform.

The short answer

At a glance (checked 20 October 2026)

Decision factorOpikW&B Weave
OwnershipComet ML, independent; reports $70M in total fundingCoreWeave (acquired W&B, May 2025); sold through CoreWeave Forge since 30 September 2026
LicenceApache-2.0 core platformWeave repository Apache-2.0
Self-hostingFree; Kubernetes for production; user administration excludedKubernetes with ClickHouse; needs a Weave-enabled W&B licence and W&B Platform install
SDKsPython, TypeScript, Java, .NET; Ruby via OpenTelemetryPython and TypeScript; TypeScript lacks guardrails, class-based scorers and cost tracking
Online evalsRules score sampled traces, spans and threadsMonitors with LLM judges; docs now call these a 'previous approach'
GuardrailsCalled from your code; fail closed with an exceptionInline scorers called from Python code; can block or modify inputs and outputs
Free tierFree Cloud: 25k spans a month, 60-day retentionForge Free: 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month
First paid tierPro Cloud: $19 a month, 100k spansForge Pro: from $60 a month, 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion; teams under 50 employees
§02 / CAPABILITY MATRIXside by side: what each covers
Side by side

Opik vs W&B Weave: capabilities side by side

CapabilityOpikW&B WeavePrefactor
Observe
LLM call tracing✓✓✓
Multi-step agent tracing (tool calls, nested spans)✓✓✓
Cost tracking✓✓✓
OpenTelemetry support✓✓✓
Evaluate
Offline evals (datasets, experiments)✓✓✓
Online evals on production traffic✓✓✓
LLM-as-a-judge scoring✓✓✓
Code-based evaluators✓✓✓
Human review and annotation✓✓✓
Prompt versioning and playground✓✓—
Act on findings
Runtime controls on live agent actionsPartialPartial✓
Gateway or proxy in the request pathPartialNot stated—
Licence and deployment
Open source✓PartialPartial
Self-hosting✓✓Partial
§03 / IN DEPTHdetail: the reasoning
In depth

Weave's owner and packaging have changed

CoreWeave completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases on 5 May 2025. On 30 September 2026 it launched CoreWeave Forge, which bundles W&B Models, Weave and new CoreWeave tools; W&B hosted accounts now sign in through Forge, while self-hosted and dedicated-instance accounts are unchanged. Weave's pricing, documentation and login now redirect to coreweave.com domains.

Read more

Within Weave, the direction for agents is shifting too. CoreWeave now recommends Agent Lens, a separate product in public preview that shares Weave's trace backend, for agent tracing and analysis, and Weave's documentation describes its built-in monitors as a 'previous approach'. If you are choosing today, expect packaging to keep moving.

Opik is built by Comet ML, which is independent. Its 2026 changelog shows steady releases, including Opik 2.0 with an environment-tagged Prompt Library in June and automatic annotation queues in October.

Agent Lens has its own SDK and UI, so a team adopting Weave for agents today may face a second move later.

Self-hosting: free install or licensed platform

Both repositories are Apache-2.0, but the terms for running them differ. Opik's self-hosted version includes every feature except user administration and needs no licence; Kubernetes is the documented production route.

Read more

Self-hosting Weave requires a Weave-enabled licence from W&B and an existing W&B Platform installation, on Kubernetes 1.29 or later with ClickHouse and S3-compatible storage. Dedicated Cloud is the single-tenant alternative. For a team without W&B already, Weave's self-hosted path is a larger commitment than Opik's.

At the Enterprise level, Opik adds unlimited users, SSO and on-premises or fully hosted deployment. Weave's Enterprise quote adds SSO, SCIM, customer-held keys, private connectivity and bring-your-own-bucket.

SDK coverage and stack fit

Weave's Python SDK is the complete one. The TypeScript SDK has no class-based scorers, no guardrails and no cost tracking. Weave accepts OTLP over HTTP and understands OTel GenAI, OpenInference and OpenLLMetry conventions, and since June 2026 its OpenTelemetry integrations are on by default. Its strongest fit is a team that already tracks model training in W&B and wants agent traces, evaluations and a Registry in the same place.

Read more

Opik's SDKs cover Python, TypeScript, Java and .NET, and it lists more than 30 framework integrations. It accepts OTLP over HTTP only. Its guardrails, like Weave's, are checks your code calls, and PII and topic checks are English only. Neither product documents approvals on agent tool actions.

Evaluation features are broadly matched. Weave's Evaluation API runs a model over a dataset with scorers and shares results as leaderboards; it has LLM-as-judge scorers, local small-model scorers for toxicity and context relevance, and annotation queues that export to datasets. Opik offers datasets, experiments and Test Suites, more than 30 built-in metrics, an 'Agent as a Judge' and a Prompt Optimizer with six algorithms. Weave calculates cost with cache tokens for supported providers, in Python only; Opik's Cost Intelligence extends cost tracking to coding agents such as Claude Code and Codex.

Pricing shape: spans versus gigabytes

As of 20 October 2026, Opik prices by spans: self-hosting is free with unlimited spans, Free Cloud covers 25k spans a month, and Pro Cloud is $19 a month for 100k spans, then $5 per 100k.

Read more

Weave is priced as part of CoreWeave Forge, by data ingested. Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month. Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion, up to 10 model seats and 100 GB of storage, for teams under 50 employees; extra ingestion is listed at $0.10 per MB. Large traces with long prompts use ingestion faster than span counts suggest, so measure your average trace size against Opik's pricing and CoreWeave Forge pricing.

Forge Pro also bundles seats and storage for W&B Models, which matters only if you use them. Enterprise ingestion overage is listed at $0.20 per MB.

§04 / THE QUALITY GAPour take: where it stops
Our take

Where Prefactor fits

We sell the layer this section describes. Read it with that in mind.

Stated plainly, since Prefactor publishes this page: Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform that scores each step of a run and acts on what it finds through runtime policies on tool calls and data access, approval holds for risky actions, and a kill switch for a run, an agent or a team. Opik and Weave both offer guardrails that your code calls to check inputs and outputs; neither holds an agent's tool action for approval. Prefactor has no prompt playground or prompt registry and its platform is hosted, so for prompt iteration, free self-hosting or a link to W&B model training, Opik or Weave is the better pick. See the full comparison of 15 platforms.

See it on your own agents

A working session on a fleet like yours: watch a run evaluated, catch a drift, walk the record.

§05 / WHICH TO PICKdecide: by your stack
Which to pick

Which one fits

Pick Opik if

  • You want to self-host without a vendor licence.
  • Your agents are written in TypeScript, Java or .NET as well as Python.
  • You prefer span-based pricing with a low first paid tier.
  • You want a vendor whose packaging has not just changed.

Pick W&B Weave if

  • You already use Weights & Biases or CoreWeave for model training.
  • Your agent code is Python.
  • You want agent traces next to models in the CoreWeave Registry.
  • You are prepared to follow the move to Agent Lens as it matures.
§06 / HOW WE REVIEWEDsources: checked October 20, 2026
Methodology

How we reviewed this comparison

Reviewed against public product and documentation pages on October 20, 2026. If a vendor has changed a feature, product name, or positioning since then, send a correction and we will update it. Numbered source links in the page body point to the ordered sources below.

Sources reviewed

  1. Opik pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  2. Opik documentation
  3. Opik website
  4. W&B Weave pricingChecked 2026-10-20.
  5. W&B Weave documentation
  6. W&B Weave ownership and status
  7. Prefactor platform
Prefactor context

Methodology

  • Reviewed public product, documentation, and launch material visible at the time of writing.
  • Mapped each page to the primary buyer, control layer, and runtime capabilities each vendor describes publicly.
  • Prefer direct product and documentation pages over analyst summaries or reseller material.
§07 / QUESTIONSfaq: the common ones
Questions
What is the difference between Opik and W&B Weave?
Both trace and evaluate LLM agents with judges, code scorers, annotation queues and prompt versions. Opik is a standalone Apache-2.0 platform that is free to self-host. Weave is part of CoreWeave Forge, and self-hosting it needs a W&B licence and a W&B Platform install.
How does Prefactor compare with Opik and W&B Weave?
Prefactor is an agent evaluation platform for teams building AI agents: it observes every agent run from development to production, evaluates whether the agent did its job, and shows how to improve it. As of 20 October 2026, Prefactor can block or hold a live agent action; Opik and W&B Weave do so in part. Opik and W&B Weave both include prompt versioning and a playground. Prefactor evaluates how prompts perform in live runs rather than providing a prompt playground or registry.
What changed for W&B Weave users in 2026?
On 30 September 2026 CoreWeave launched Forge, and W&B hosted accounts now sign in through it. Self-hosted and dedicated-instance accounts are unchanged. CoreWeave also released Agent Lens in public preview and recommends it for agent tracing.
Does W&B Weave work with TypeScript?
Yes, with fewer features than Python. The TypeScript SDK does not support class-based scorers, guardrails or cost tracking.
Can I move traces from W&B Weave to Opik?
Both accept OTLP over HTTP, so OpenTelemetry instrumentation can point at either. Code that uses Weave's own decorators or Opik's SDK would need changing. Opik added an import command for traces of any age in September 2026; check whether it reads your Weave export format.
Which is cheaper for a small team?
As of 20 October 2026, Opik Pro Cloud is $19 a month for 100k spans and Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB of Weave ingestion. Opik can also be self-hosted for free. The units differ, so compare on your own trace sizes.
Who owns Opik?
As of 20 October 2026: Comet ML, Inc., an independent company founded in 2017 that reports $70M in total funding.
Is Opik open source?
Yes. The core platform, including tracing, evaluation, the UI, backend and SDKs, is Apache-2.0 and free to self-host.
How much does Opik cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Self-hosting is free with unlimited spans. Free Cloud covers 25k spans a month and 10 users. Pro Cloud is $19 a month for 100k spans, then $5 per 100k. Enterprise is custom.
Can Opik block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Opik guardrails run as a blocking check that your code must call and handle. There are no approval workflows for agent actions.
Who owns W&B Weave?
As of 20 October 2026: CoreWeave, which completed its acquisition of Weights & Biases in May 2025. Since September 2026 W&B hosted accounts sign in through CoreWeave Forge.
Is W&B Weave open source?
Partly. The Weave repository is Apache-2.0, but self-hosting Weave needs a W&B licence and an existing W&B platform deployment.
How much does W&B Weave cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Forge Free includes 1 GB of Weave ingestion a month. Forge Pro starts at $60 a month with 1.5 GB, for teams under 50 people; the pricing page lists extra ingestion at $0.10 per MB. Enterprise is custom.
Can W&B Weave block or hold a live agent action?
Partly. Guardrails are scorers called from Python application code that can block or modify inputs and outputs. The TypeScript SDK does not support them, and there are no approvals on agent actions.
Is Prefactor open source?
Partly. Its deterministic evals package is Apache-2.0; the platform is hosted.
How much does Prefactor cost?
As of 20 October 2026: Dev is free with 5,000 spans a month. Startup is $49 a month and Scaleup $199 a month. Enterprise is custom above 4 million spans a month.
Can Prefactor block or hold a live agent action?
Yes. Runtime policies can block, throttle, sandbox or escalate an agent's tool calls and data access before they run, approval routing holds risky actions for a person, and a kill switch stops a run, an agent or a team.
Reviewed against public sources on October 20, 2026Suggest a correction

Score the run, then act on it

Prefactor scores each step of every agent run and can hold or stop an action when a score says it should not happen. Start on the free tier: 5,000 spans a month, no credit card required.

Agent Performance Platform
Unified performance platform for agents, authentication, and risk management
All Systems Operational
3Global Agents
7Instances
5Services
12%Human Intervene
4High Risk
$2,360Monthly Spend
Mission ControlLive agent health with 7-day activity heartbeat
Claims Proc...68
$330/moRed
Claims Proc...65
$160/moRed
Claims Proc...82
$170/moAmber
ChatGPT74
$150/moAmber

See how every agent performs, and make it better

Prefactor helps teams observe, evaluate, and improve their AI agents in production, across every framework and provider.